Hi, So nothing changed in LA, and any understandings to the contrary are mistaken? avri Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au> </div><div>Date:09/27/2015 10:48 AM (GMT-08:00) </div><div>To: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> </div><div>Cc: </div><div>Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Summary of current Board sentiment </div><div> </div>Hello Eberhard,
can you please "share your understanding" of what you mean below in the form of an executive summary?
OK - I will try. - the Board was getting some feedback that it wasn't aligned with the detailed comments that it submitted - so we wanted to confirm that yes the comments we submitted represent our views on the draft proposal, and our suggestions for improvement. - the Board wanted to be clear that we want to work with the CCWG on a common proposal that we can all support. As Keith noted, this means all including the Board will need to compromise, without compromising our joint goals. Regards, Bruce Tonkin _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community