Hello all, Sorry for the delay. The notes, recordings and transcripts for the Face to Face - Paris - Day 2, Session 2 (18 July)will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/FIFCAw A copy of the notes and action items may be found below. Thank you. Best regards, Kim Notes IRP · to more closely focus the IRP to identify if ICANN has failed to act, and satisfy the statutory claims of the sole member · community selection process to designate members of the panel. To create a pre-vetted pool of members and alternates · standing: available to person or entity materially harmed, by action or inaction. · tender a process to find an organisation to set-up the IRP court, though an RFP from well qualified candidates · expertise: beyond technical, e.g. diplomatic, regulatory · diversity: aspirational diversity, and some suggestions for caps, minimum or maximum from a region · scope: for any violation of the bylaws, and under the mission and core values ICANN has an obligation to follow documented policy and act without discrimination · Exhaustion: can't sit on the sidelines of a police development process, there is an obligation to be part of the process · Some contemplation of having to go to ombudsman or reconsideration process before launch of an IRP. · the period of the consideration should be fixed, as a WS2 effort to define processes. · Criteria for appeal will be established. Avoiding frivolous or insubstantive claims · Diversity important for the panel. · Community driven, but the Board will also have a say. · CCWG to continue to developed rules of procedure · Consideration of issues out of scope of the IRP · Appels procedure, avoiding a continuous loop. · Support for the enhanced IRP 2. - Removal / recall Board members Individual Directors · should be open and transparent · support for the appointing SO/AC being able to remove their director · Provided 3 option for removal of NomCom appointed directors · The single member does the removal, but on instruction from the SO/AC · NomCom removal process to be discussed/agreed · Assume this power will be exercised as the other powers, with petition and thresholds for agreements · Need to synchronise with the reference model, the community forum and voting mechanisms · To be aware of the CWG dependencies · Most feedback was that the appointing body would be the remover. · Principle of fairness, the criteria of what constitutes cause should be available to all appointed. · Thresholds should be consistent across SO/AC and NomCom. · The decision threshold in the proposal is the same for all Directors · Notion of fairness and criteria for removal should be considered by WP3 · Sébastien Bachollet expresses concern and a member's minority view on Director removal · Concern noted that the ability for the appointing body to remove a Director may turn that person into a representative of that body, not to serve ICANN as a whole.