initial legal responses to our questions
All, may I kindly ask we discuss this subject tomorrow during our session? Remember, we got this initial legal feedback because we asked for it. We did not want to wait until our legal sub team has finished its work on a scoping document. We will discuss the topic tomorrow, which will be the ideal opportunity to exchange thoughts and avoid further misunderstandings. At least the document has stimulated a discussion on potential outcomes. Thomas
What is the estimated timeline by which CCWG can hire its own lawyers to get an independent non-conflicted viewpoint? If it is much longer, we should do it sans ICANN legal staff "assistance". Thanks, Robin On Feb 8, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, may I kindly ask we discuss this subject tomorrow during our session?
Remember, we got this initial legal feedback because we asked for it. We did not want to wait until our legal sub team has finished its work on a scoping document.
We will discuss the topic tomorrow, which will be the ideal opportunity to exchange thoughts and avoid further misunderstandings. At least the document has stimulated a discussion on potential outcomes.
Thomas _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Hi Robin, That is part of what we will be discussing at our legal sub-team dinner tonight. Initially we have an estimate of having the law firm identified and contracted by the end of February. Then, depending on their knowledge about ICANN, we estimate having their advice by late march. These are estimate dates. Of course. Best regards, León
El 08/02/2015, a las 17:49, Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> escribió:
What is the estimated timeline by which CCWG can hire its own lawyers to get an independent non-conflicted viewpoint? If it is much longer, we should do it sans ICANN legal staff "assistance".
Thanks, Robin
On Feb 8, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, may I kindly ask we discuss this subject tomorrow during our session?
Remember, we got this initial legal feedback because we asked for it. We did not want to wait until our legal sub team has finished its work on a scoping document.
We will discuss the topic tomorrow, which will be the ideal opportunity to exchange thoughts and avoid further misunderstandings. At least the document has stimulated a discussion on potential outcomes.
Thomas _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is wrong with discussing it on the Mailing List? el On 2015-02-08 17:43 , Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, may I kindly ask we discuss this subject tomorrow during our session?
Remember, we got this initial legal feedback because we asked for it. We did not want to wait until our legal sub team has finished its work on a scoping document.
We will discuss the topic tomorrow, which will be the ideal opportunity to exchange thoughts and avoid further misunderstandings. At least the document has stimulated a discussion on potential outcomes.
Thomas
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIVAwUBVNc2SpcFHaN5RT+rAQIFHxAAq2jm6LJuZ1BIh8zPVFMSMyGvFE9XGFYq 5KZUZDBk8VwRzfZ2zToPFtnR+g+lYa+tQ0cF1MEO3SogR+GhUCVAyS2Wn/lyk+CI 2sBYR7lYp7lMqKoOIcOSuhA0HmqYtDd7KNP7zat2K3G/zXeuZAp3lzbdzblFL9Cw nA9h4Rz3ZGhW8fVWPZMOEXTY0viYaQ0Uf5Q9ZPdANSJJFJfUX53u+g7avblfqWRP v/UIgyXtwmpo8g8HE0ISbQBsKaaEk2jbvr2KYjl2nQ0kzFGa4hm9i3Lb8BiLEmKE /DHsJeDelrzCllmYq6SlQSufed4oBP1ohMbbxGxn9jAaCfYJEJ9b40Dz/cnC+PZl LBxfFg+5VND4y+R+RIoUhW98ZuXl4q4MGZW7d/Z+3bwUHU4Vgl2eiroAY+Pv+X4L lb6iDrjy7MtX8LphiZ+PMJ61Lin4W/k/JNHHZh33RuEKEYa3oxOYhOPdZps7f3Ra COieyOUoteooCYMAGiKXppxSaF8xf7ZaUOEzy7I/UBDuPmhfWzFIyf3NvjxF6kv4 Y9e51SdbVK2DTNn2xyJ3/5XbAvFDqVii81ZoIPMFUH2jP5U1+uZ4XIJLM82FDUZ2 2DDF/WBaPKe/s1slLzsbwAxNOtqwmYSkoiax6VFlJPW381Wd0TVOXpMDuSBG5G5V DfXEbWdsqFY= =GUiM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Perhaps because I was sending email from my pocket? ;-) -----Original Message----- From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Dr Eberhard W Lisse Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 6:11 PM To: Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] initial legal responses to our questions -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is wrong with discussing it on the Mailing List? el On 2015-02-08 17:43 , Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, may I kindly ask we discuss this subject tomorrow during our session?
Remember, we got this initial legal feedback because we asked for it. We did not want to wait until our legal sub team has finished its work on a scoping document.
We will discuss the topic tomorrow, which will be the ideal opportunity to exchange thoughts and avoid further misunderstandings. At least the document has stimulated a discussion on potential outcomes.
Thomas
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIVAwUBVNc2SpcFHaN5RT+rAQIFHxAAq2jm6LJuZ1BIh8zPVFMSMyGvFE9XGFYq 5KZUZDBk8VwRzfZ2zToPFtnR+g+lYa+tQ0cF1MEO3SogR+GhUCVAyS2Wn/lyk+CI 2sBYR7lYp7lMqKoOIcOSuhA0HmqYtDd7KNP7zat2K3G/zXeuZAp3lzbdzblFL9Cw nA9h4Rz3ZGhW8fVWPZMOEXTY0viYaQ0Uf5Q9ZPdANSJJFJfUX53u+g7avblfqWRP v/UIgyXtwmpo8g8HE0ISbQBsKaaEk2jbvr2KYjl2nQ0kzFGa4hm9i3Lb8BiLEmKE /DHsJeDelrzCllmYq6SlQSufed4oBP1ohMbbxGxn9jAaCfYJEJ9b40Dz/cnC+PZl LBxfFg+5VND4y+R+RIoUhW98ZuXl4q4MGZW7d/Z+3bwUHU4Vgl2eiroAY+Pv+X4L lb6iDrjy7MtX8LphiZ+PMJ61Lin4W/k/JNHHZh33RuEKEYa3oxOYhOPdZps7f3Ra COieyOUoteooCYMAGiKXppxSaF8xf7ZaUOEzy7I/UBDuPmhfWzFIyf3NvjxF6kv4 Y9e51SdbVK2DTNn2xyJ3/5XbAvFDqVii81ZoIPMFUH2jP5U1+uZ4XIJLM82FDUZ2 2DDF/WBaPKe/s1slLzsbwAxNOtqwmYSkoiax6VFlJPW381Wd0TVOXpMDuSBG5G5V DfXEbWdsqFY= =GUiM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
participants (5)
-
Dr Eberhard W Lisse -
Drazek, Keith -
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía -
Robin Gross -
Thomas Rickert