Hello all, The recordings and transcripts for the WP1 Meeting #20 held on 22 July will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/sYVCAw Thank you. Kind regards, Kim Action Items Action: produce text on voting weights and influence for the mechanism before Friday Action: Grace and Steve to work on incorporating text on page 3 as it relates to stress test Action: include petitioning period in Bylaws Action: Steve to propose an updated draft (will write up a 2-step disclosure process) Action: remove bracketed text on page 1 Action: drafting to be clear that any standards would be advisory only Action: CCWG to discuss paragraph 11 Action (Jordan): clean up document and recirculate for discussion next week. Action: include header either here or in community powers sections Action: Jordan to have discussion with Steve, Chairs, and staff to get a clear statement as soon as possible to the full CCWG list Action: please send your suggestions ASAP on any additional work to do Action: Jordan to circulate draft agenda Notes 1. Community Model * Edit Page 2: "It provides greather legal enforceability than the Empowered So/AC model" * Edit Page 2: change "given" to "given that" * Whenever referring to a decision maker, we need to refer to the right one * IGNORE text on "influence in the community mechanism" --> was not intended for distribution and needed further information on how the voting weights work. Action: produce text on voting weights and influence for the mechanism before Friday 2. Fundamental Bylaws * merged sections 3.2. and 5.4 * CWG dependencies included on page 2 Action: Grace and Steve to work on incorporating text on page 3 as it relates to stress test 3. Standard Bylaws * Community should be able to provide feedback in comment period as well as review period. Is a review period of 2 weeks enough? Action: include petitioning period in Bylaws 4. AOC Reviews into the ICANN Bylaws * NDA text needs to be developed * Edit: change review team to "review teams or a subset thereof" to be aware of the fact that some review teams do not want to be fully involved in these disclosures. * Suggested text from James Gannon: "A confindential disclosure framework shall be published by ICANN. The confidential dosclusre framework shall describe the process by which a review team may request acccess to and the process for classification of documentation. The CDA will provide a mechanism of escalation for relese of documentation to duly authorised review teams" Action: Steve to propose an updated draft (will write up a 2-step disclosure process) 5. Removal of Individual Directors * Poll on page 1: ticks to delete the bracketed text * Ticks: 12; Crosses: 0; (Total participants: 21 (6 of whom were staff/counsel who were not eligible for vote)) Action: remove bracketed text on page 1 Action: drafting to be clear that any standards would be advisory only Action: CCWG to discuss paragraph 11 6. Recall of the entire ICANN Board * Lawyers provided a redline review of this document -- possible that there is too much detail * Question: is everyone ok with this document or do you need more time? * Ticks: 4 = ok with doc * Crosses: 5 = need more time Action (Jordan): clean up document and recirculate for discussion next week. 7. ICANN Budget Action: include header either here or in community powers sections Action: Jordan to have discussion with Steve, Chairs, and staff to get a clear statement as soon as possible to the full CCWG list 8. Identification of any other bits of work we need to do to wrap this up Action: please send your suggestions ASAP on any additional work to do 9. Agree Agenda outline for meeting #21. Action: Jordan to circulate draft agenda