Dear CCWG I noticed that in the public comments there are a number of comments directed to the potential risk created if ICANN changes its corporate formation to other than a California Non-Profit Membership Corporation (after implementation of Accountability measures) and/or moves offices out of the United States. The risk described is difficulty in enforcing the Community Powers. I know the CCWG must have considered this previously and apparently did not make this a condition or fundamental bylaw, but it does strike me this situation increases the risk that Congress will not leave the proposal alone once certified by NTIA. (One example of a company commenting on this aspect of the proposal is INTEL.) Does the CCWG consider this issue to be “asked and answered”? Or will it be discussed again in the context of the public comment work to be done in LA? I understand that many are focused on addressing the “minimum necessary” to effect the IANA transition in Work Stream 1 and “keeping things simple”, but I do think there is a big difference between the “minimum necessary” for NTIA approval and the “optimum approach” for avoiding issues with Congress after NTIA certification. Anne [cid:image001.gif@01D0F07C.BD36A3B0] Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 (T) 520.629.4428 | (F) 520.879.4725 AAikman@LRRLaw.com<mailto:AAikman@LRRLaw.com> | www.LRRLaw.com<http://www.lrrlaw.com/> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.