objections to "decisions" taken in CCWG #65
I had to step away from today's CCWG meeting #65 and so want to be sure my views are on the record on a couple issues. 1. I agree that bullet 4 on transparency reforms (disclosure of the lobbying efforts) belongs in WS1. The move to the designator model makes dependence on transparency more critical than previously thought and this issue can be quickly accommodated. 2. I strongly disagree with the decision making model proposed in the meeting and declared as the new reference model. I remain concerned about the re-allocation of decisional power away from the SO's and towards the AC's, and in particular changing GAC's role away from "advisory" to having a decisional weight equal equal to SO's. This change is in the opposite direction of that called for in public comments. 3. I also don't support the new proposal to ban split decisions within SO's and AC's, which is a significant change to what was in our first two draft proposals and has no public comment mandate and will silence minority views in the decisional process. I will attach more detailed dissenting opinions on these issues to the final report. Thanks, Robin
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org> wrote:
3. I also don't support the new proposal to ban split decisions within SO's and AC's, which is a significant change to what was in our first two draft proposals and has no public comment mandate and will silence minority views in the decisional process.
Jordan did clarify this particular item to me during the meeting; the proposal does not ban SO/AC from doing their internal spiting/voting anyhow they like towards achieving their independent consensus. However there can be no split vote consideration when observing consensus across the participation SO/AC. So in the essence its the responsibility of each SO/AC to ensure that their internal processes produces an outcome of either to be in support or against a particular community power action. It may be good to know if you are still against based on that understanding. Regards
I will attach more detailed dissenting opinions on these issues to the final report.
Thanks, Robin
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Co-Chairs, I could not attend today's call, as I have to work for a living. I agree with Robin on all items. greetings, el On 2015-11-03 16:26, Robin Gross wrote:
I had to step away from today's CCWG meeting #65 and so want to be sure my views are on the record on a couple issues.
1. I agree that bullet 4 on transparency reforms (disclosure of the lobbying efforts) belongs in WS1. The move to the designator model makes dependence on transparency more critical than previously thought and this issue can be quickly accommodated.
2. I strongly disagree with the decision making model proposed in the meeting and declared as the new reference model. I remain concerned about the re-allocation of decisional power away from the SO's and towards the AC's, and in particular changing GAC's role away from "advisory" to having a decisional weight equal equal to SO's. This change is in the opposite direction of that called for in public comments.
3. I also don't support the new proposal to ban split decisions within SO's and AC's, which is a significant change to what was in our first two draft proposals and has no public comment mandate and will silence minority views in the decisional process.
I will attach more detailed dissenting opinions on these issues to the final report.
Thanks, Robin [...]
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIVAwUBVjjLB5cFHaN5RT+rAQJlCBAAjh3A00DCbzTzfIv64NgB66nRi3Nb+j+m Nutfoi8BA7ggtKmabSAbaGzM/vKi9+t5K/sIrttUV/ZJtcOz7xgCj4dEir/N0GwK T4sTBVzt3hffJpWheCSDvydXFab6etVccGherfCno5/Uczn0hL1LpUJ84YptwBIb PFNEKSVXMKqu664sLhrzgZiCfmq7oz8jQCr9eUOePNLTWyfPm4+BBPug7bKYZLfQ NrxraTgqS2UYgq7QnpkLj1ye9ZAzpsUUp3ildsPs2oGMVgBv/5+P/kENnoefr3mI P1Y8UEjgrhXmQBaeN5JPrbURIewKGGTQADgGz+FupdxTjABPwiWl9X1nUpMmHUxH DYlLe4PN3UgwZ4KwPheJ/lYAo4aiWqEddeH4ts0FZXcBNFU96iAgQMhsCXdMCT0J i7BNGRWuelh7ABRqbi9Jae8v8ZVad91/oD8oXG6lS8TL+pczJbOLe8vFujXhJaXo lubaOtWjaOKaDGXra26vFEToOAeehBvCCmSgCgK81iqfJSxoreMb+iLLYMT6Nv6o B4Ahzgmv50gGsMgmP2n5J4s4reP0mTepXPwIuptF6+HoVx0vpOpNppL+CFBe7QUk W8YMXw5aqthOsZtS/w2AARbGBl483Tg4J6fNPMNW/DByAxUNuVoLl5PeHkwmyaKw WianVI0Ijhw= =U1La -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (3)
-
Dr Eberhard W Lisse -
Robin Gross -
Seun Ojedeji