A thought on the legal team selection
Hi, I am not asking to be an observer of that team. A thought I had on the advantage of a different team than the one CWG has selected. Using an analogy: When getting major surgery, it is good to have separate opinions. When they agree, you are probably ok, when they don't there is more discussion to be had before going under the knife. avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Avri, as a practicing (gynecologic) surgeon I have subject matter exepertise and I must say that your analogy is not a good one. el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
On Mar 12, 2015, at 01:20, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
I am not asking to be an observer of that team.
A thought I had on the advantage of a different team than the one CWG has selected.
Using an analogy: When getting major surgery, it is good to have separate opinions. When they agree, you are probably ok, when they don't there is more discussion to be had before going under the knife.
avri
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Hi, Sorry, I was speaking as the relative of patients. An area where I, unfortunately, have great experience. In this case we are the patients, not the practitioners. avri On 12-Mar-15 01:39, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Avri,
as a practicing (gynecologic) surgeon I have subject matter exepertise and I must say that your analogy is not a good one.
el
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
On Mar 12, 2015, at 01:20, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org <mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I am not asking to be an observer of that team.
A thought I had on the advantage of a different team than the one CWG has selected.
Using an analogy: When getting major surgery, it is good to have separate opinions. When they agree, you are probably ok, when they don't there is more discussion to be had before going under the knife.
avri
------------------------------------------------------------------------ <http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com/>
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Avri, I am fully aware. Nevermind my own recent surgery :-)-O My point remains same. greetings, el On 2015-03-12 11:40, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I was speaking as the relative of patients. An area where I, unfortunately, have great experience.
In this case we are the patients, not the practitioners.
avri
On 12-Mar-15 01:39, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Avri,
as a practicing (gynecologic) surgeon I have subject matter exepertise and I must say that your analogy is not a good one.
el
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
On Mar 12, 2015, at 01:20, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org <mailto:avri@acm.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I am not asking to be an observer of that team.
A thought I had on the advantage of a different team than the one CWG has selected.
Using an analogy: When getting major surgery, it is good to have separate opinions. When they agree, you are probably ok, when they don't there is more discussion to be had before going under the knife.
avri
participants (3)
-
Avri Doria -
Dr Eberhard Lisse -
Dr Eberhard W Lisse