Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [ST-WP] Additional Stress Test for consideration
Yes, this is visible during revocation and transfer of ccTLDs and we must address it from this general level. Greetings, el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
On Mar 13, 2015, at 01:51, Edward Morris <egmorris1@toast.net> wrote:
Hi everybody,
During a call today regarding ICANN’s transition and accountability, David Post called for development of a stress test we don’t currently have. I’d like to present it to the sub-group for consideration with the recommendation we act positively on his recommendation.
This would belong in Stress Test Category Four: Failure of Accountability.
The problem is one some of us believe we’ve encountered with increasing frequency at ICANN: staff substituting their policy preferences for the policy developed through proper processes. Staff could do this intentionally or unintentionally. The result is the same.
In this scenario a policy is properly developed (most often through a PDP) but when implementing the policy staff creates processes that effectively change or negate the policy developed.
This is a major accountability problem and we don’t seem to be testing to ensure we have proper accountability processes in place to deal with it. I’d suggest we do so. I’m happy to help with this as needed.
Thanks for considering.
Edward Morris
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list Ccwg-accountability4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4
I am curious how the stress test came to be. I expected something different. Is the IPC stress test a standard for stress test in academia that is writing and talking about something rather than real life test On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:
Yes, this is visible during revocation and transfer of ccTLDs and we must address it from this general level.
Greetings, el
-- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6
On Mar 13, 2015, at 01:51, Edward Morris <egmorris1@toast.net> wrote:
Hi everybody,
During a call today regarding ICANN’s transition and accountability, David Post called for development of a stress test we don’t currently have. I’d like to present it to the sub-group for consideration with the recommendation we act positively on his recommendation.
This would belong in Stress Test Category Four: Failure of Accountability.
The problem is one some of us believe we’ve encountered with increasing frequency at ICANN: staff substituting their policy preferences for the policy developed through proper processes. Staff could do this intentionally or unintentionally. The result is the same.
In this scenario a policy is properly developed (most often through a PDP) but when implementing the policy staff creates processes that effectively change or negate the policy developed.
This is a major accountability problem and we don’t seem to be testing to ensure we have proper accountability processes in place to deal with it. I’d suggest we do so. I’m happy to help with this as needed.
Thanks for considering.
Edward Morris
_______________________________________________ Ccwg-accountability4 mailing list Ccwg-accountability4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-accountability4
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Sincerely CARRIE Devorah 562 688 2883 DISCLAIMER : With the continuing crossing and interfacing of platforms both on & off line both with & without our knowledge nor approval to note nothing sent over the Internet anymore is ever private nor should be presumed to be so. If it is that much of a secret, say nothing. If you must? Take a lesson from our military- hand write the note, chew then swallow
participants (2)
-
Carrie Devorah -
Dr Eberhard W Lisse