Dear all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for the Accountability Stress Tests Meeting #4 on 15 April will be available here: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895714 <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895714%20> Action Items ACTION ITEM - Steve to refine paragraph on page 1 ACTION ITEM -Jonathan to recirculate explanatory note ACTION ITEM - remove strike through ACTION ITEM - Read CWG input and incorporate any effect this may have on ST 21 as needed. ACTION ITEM - Cheryl to contact Bart Boswinkel/Bernie Turcotte to incorporate language Notes Accountability Stress Tests WP Meeting #4 on 15 April Link: ST-WP Drafts - http://tinyurl.com/mye8o3e These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content of the call and do not substitute in any way the transcript. P1 last paragraph will be edited. ST of interest to CWG will be added. ACTION ITEM - Steve to refine paragraph on page 1 Edward Morris' additional ST will be #26 STs # 3, 4, 29, 11, 27, 17 - Board Inaction: ability to spur the Board to make a decision in order to trigger a reconsideration or IRP is not firmly established in any of the design powers and mechanisms yet. Outreach to legal on Board inaction has not led to formal feedback. Suggestion that threaten Board of removal to solve for Board inaction is not a formal mechanism. Expanding on ATRT recommendation #9 language in the bylaws might be sufficient to trigger the IRP and other review mechanisms that are being worked on in Work Party 2. Conversation with WP1 to ensure inducing Board action is a community power. WP2 discussion about whether or not existing redress mechanisms could somehow be triggered by a failure to act. ACTION ITEM -Jonathan to recirculate explanatory note Steve del Bianco flagged that Preserving AoC commitments in ICANN bylaws will be discussed in WP1 Suggestion that better to have Bylaw provision that forces Board an accountability to the community to respond to Advisory Committee formal advice. - Advisory Committees would benefit from this. Outreach to ACs might be needed. Community Veto STs #3, 4, 19, 10, 20, 15 ACTION ITEM - remove strike through ST #18 GAC Discussion is pending. Some GAC support for ST recommendation. Should more urgent issues come forward from WP1 - WP2, stress test 18 still needs discussion - would cut back on 14 - 17 GAO Steve provided GAO with overview of STs ST #21 Suggestion to amend ST 21 in light af CWG remarks concerning appeal mechanism and respect national legislation on redelegation ACTION ITEM - Read CWG input and incorporate any effect this may have on ST 21 as needed. Consider including reference to GAC principles ACTION ITEM - Cheryl to contact Bart Boswinkel/Bernie Turcotte to incorporate language