Dear AFRALO members I am reaching out to you for your input on the working document which can be accessed here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T0xtCnO1iYRLWQ0ueN2ZRZDdTW3F2PAE/edit?us...> for the continuous improvement program. As you may be aware, The third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) Recommendation 3.6 calls for the evolution of Organizational Reviews conducted by an Independent Examiner into a Continuous Improvement Program (CIP)<https://community.icann.org/x/PIDCEQ> led by the ICANN community. The Board deferred<https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-re...> upcoming Organizational Reviews until 2025 so that this recommendation and others from ATRT3 could be implemented. The ICANN community demonstrated great interest in contributing to the evolution of Organizational Reviews into a CIP, with 21 out of 22 of the groups<https://community.icann.org/x/GIQYEQ> across the ICANN community represented in a Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG) which convened in January 2024. The CIP-CCG is tasked with developing a framework for the CIP, which will be published for Public Comment prior to adoption by each SO, AC, and the NomCom. As AFRALO community we have an opportunity to input to this evolving discussion by contributing to the draft document before it is submitted as a final document of the AFRALO. Kind Regards, Bram. [https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/docs/AHkbwyL2rgmGz47EJgC4tiRGc3SKPYsLMXGNn-Pb-EDHo6fARWDdJ-HQBw2ssZKzN9vZ6hXvp1Jvwsh0DF-pbnGjTOJt9N9dnu3BAaIdgA=w1200-h630-p]<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T0xtCnO1iYRLWQ0ueN2ZRZDdTW3F2PAE/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103604893429807042881&rtpof=true&sd=true> AFRALO and ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement.docx<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T0xtCnO1iYRLWQ0ueN2ZRZDdTW3F2PAE/edit?us...> ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement Status of this Document: Final Draft – Ready for Consensus Call AFRALO and the ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement Historically, ICANN Organizational Reviews have asked whether the Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs), ... docs.google.com