hi Alan, I agree with your points and think it not useful that African RALOs are held to astandard of participation that no one else in the internet policy making is subject to (that I am aware of anyway). apologies for the top posting. regards, McTim On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Alan Levin<alan@futureperfect.co.za> wrote:
Dear Mohammed and others,
On 06 Jul 2009, at 8:28 PM, Mohamed EL Bashir wrote:
As i promised on last AfRALO Teleconferences, please find attached my proposed document on AfRALO active participation document,The main objective this document is to list the available AfRALO participation channels and tools ( e.g AfRALO teleconferences, AfRALO mailing list, ..ect ), and set a minimum participation criteria for the participation of AfRALO members in order to encourage an active participation in ICANN policy development processes.
This is very kind of you and I agree with others comments that it is a great effort. Thank you!
The following are my personal comments and do not necessarily reflect the views of ISOC-ZA.
Minimum Participation: ALS are encouraged to participate in AfRALO month teleconference, and maintain minimum of 50% of AfRALO yearly Teleconference “12 teleconference” ( 6 teleconference a year ). Any ALS will be participate in less than 50% of the teleconferences will be considered un-active member.
I have participated in one teleconference and attempted to participate in two others. I am sorry that I found it very frustrating, it is challenging to deal with the poor telecommunications infrastructure in Africa. I found that combined with the challenge of real time translation it is not workable for me. At this stage I cannot find another volunteer who will do this. I suggest that another format must be used if you want to drive teleconference participation.
Minimum Participation: it’s not hard measure mailing list postings but members are required to participate and post a in a minimum 1 discussed topic in a given month.
I have been through the mailing list and I'm not certain that there are sufficient topics relevant to African development to insist on this. In reality there are possibly only a couple of issues that ICANN touches on that really effect African users. I am not certain if this is one I will support although I am possibly missing the point.
Minimum Participation: Online participation in wikis can differ from a member to another member, but AfRALO members should minimally contribute to one Wiki topic at a given month.
Similar to mailing list.
Minimum Participation: African ALS are encouraged to participate in AfRALO GM .
This is a generic requirement and probably the one that I most agree with although I suggest some minor changes.
- African ALS are required to vote in every AFRalo decision ALSs are consulted on and require a vote (including appointment of new ALAC members, policy decisions, polls, etc.) Should any ALS not vote on any three consecutive voting opportunities they are removed as an ALS (there will need to be various warnings should there be a vote and this will need to be added to the bylaws if it is to hold any weight).
If there is any further participation requirement I would add: - African ALS are required to inform all their members of AfRALO activities and opportunities to participate, as well as any ICANN activities that may directly effect them. - African ALS are required to initiate and participate in any discussion that directly relates to African Internet Users.
Please feel free to flame me :)
warm regards to you all,
Alan