Draft presentation for ICANN57 At-Large meeting with Nextgen
Dear All, A preliminary draft of the At-Large presentation for the At-Large meeting with the Nextgen students at ICANN57 can be found at https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_Vrdx-Pi... Its based on the presentation done for the At-Large-Nextgen meeting at ICANN56 I've put some comments for possible improvements but wanted to share now to get additional suggestions from you all. Dev Anand
Dear Dev Greetings from Pakistan. Just a quick comment. Being a part of NextGen myself, I feel the portion of How to Engage needs a little more work, because in the end that's what we all want from NextGen right? To give you an example, thankfully you'll find people from technical, law, policy, civil society background in NextGen. So I think, we need to include one more slide that has 2 columns, 1 for the name of the stakeholder group and next to it the WGs that fall into that category, not all but maybe some. It will be a lot convenient. I can see the link to WGs on slide, but trust me when I say this, a lot of youth today wont bother going to the website and then surf and search and read mission statements and purpose of WGs to find a suitable place (unless you are an ICANN addict like myself), compared to when they already know which WGs fall under their stakeholder affiliation which they can quickly jot down without having to download the whole presentation. The sole purpose of 'Engagement' won't be as effective as we would want it to be. I hope you get my point and will consider it in your final version. Thanking in anticipation. Adeel Sadiq Pakistan On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
A preliminary draft of the At-Large presentation for the At-Large meeting with the Nextgen students at ICANN57 can be found at
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_ Vrdx-PiU1zEEW4/edit?usp=sharing
Its based on the presentation done for the At-Large-Nextgen meeting at ICANN56 I've put some comments for possible improvements but wanted to share now to get additional suggestions from you all.
Dev Anand _______________________________________________ Alac-sc-outreach mailing list Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
Thanks Adeel for this. So for reference the WGs can be found at https://atlarge.icann.org/ and the https://atlarge.icann.org/get-involved page has the ability to sort WGs by Policy, Process and Outreach and Engagement You mentioned the following categories of persons in Nextgen : technical, law, policy and civil society What's the difference between law and policy persons? Some possible mappings: Technical mapping to Technical Issues https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/technical-issues Accessibilty https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/accessibility Technology https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/technology Policy (and Law) mapping to ICANN Evolution https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/icann-evolution IDN Policy https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/idn-policy New gTLDs https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/new-gtlds Registration Issues https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/registration-issues Public Interest https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/registration-issues Civil Society mapping to Capacity Building https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/capacity-building Outreach and Engagement : https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/outreach-engagement Social Media https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/outreach-engagement and not showing the process WGs (in which there are many) But are these mappings accurate ? Wouldn't we want all persons that care about end user issues be involved in one or more policy WGs? Kind Regards, Dev Anand Can someone attempt to put on the Google Presentations such a table On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Adeel Sadiq <11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk> wrote:
Dear Dev
Greetings from Pakistan. Just a quick comment. Being a part of NextGen myself, I feel the portion of How to Engage needs a little more work, because in the end that's what we all want from NextGen right?
To give you an example, thankfully you'll find people from technical, law, policy, civil society background in NextGen. So I think, we need to include one more slide that has 2 columns, 1 for the name of the stakeholder group and next to it the WGs that fall into that category, not all but maybe some. It will be a lot convenient. I can see the link to WGs on slide, but trust me when I say this, a lot of youth today wont bother going to the website and then surf and search and read mission statements and purpose of WGs to find a suitable place (unless you are an ICANN addict like myself), compared to when they already know which WGs fall under their stakeholder affiliation which they can quickly jot down without having to download the whole presentation. The sole purpose of 'Engagement' won't be as effective as we would want it to be.
I hope you get my point and will consider it in your final version.
Thanking in anticipation.
Adeel Sadiq Pakistan
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
A preliminary draft of the At-Large presentation for the At-Large meeting with the Nextgen students at ICANN57 can be found at
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_Vrdx-Pi...
Its based on the presentation done for the At-Large-Nextgen meeting at ICANN56 I've put some comments for possible improvements but wanted to share now to get additional suggestions from you all.
Dev Anand _______________________________________________ Alac-sc-outreach mailing list Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
Dear Dev I am not a policy/law person. Hence I cannot tell the difference. Maybe some one from respective stakeholder group can guide us better. I am not sure if they are 100% accurate, I just want them there. Just like you mapped them, do so in presentation. Its upto you how many stakeholders you want to include, according to the NextGenners here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-08-19-en In my time the stakeholder group was mentioned along with each NextGenner. Maybe you will have to ask Deborah Escalera/Janice Lange in this regard. With your experience and deep knowledge of ICANN, you can map it a lot better than I could. Regards Adeel On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Adeel for this.
So for reference the WGs can be found at https://atlarge.icann.org/ and the https://atlarge.icann.org/get-involved page has the ability to sort WGs by Policy, Process and Outreach and Engagement
You mentioned the following categories of persons in Nextgen : technical, law, policy and civil society
What's the difference between law and policy persons?
Some possible mappings:
Technical mapping to Technical Issues https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/technical-issues Accessibilty https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/accessibility Technology https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/technology
Policy (and Law) mapping to ICANN Evolution https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/icann-evolution IDN Policy https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/idn-policy New gTLDs https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/new-gtlds Registration Issues https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/registration- issues Public Interest https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/registration- issues
Civil Society mapping to Capacity Building https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/capacity- building Outreach and Engagement : https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/outreach-engagement Social Media https://atlarge.icann.org/working_groups/outreach-engagement
and not showing the process WGs (in which there are many)
But are these mappings accurate ? Wouldn't we want all persons that care about end user issues be involved in one or more policy WGs?
Kind Regards,
Dev Anand
Can someone attempt to put on the Google Presentations such a table
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Adeel Sadiq <11beeasadiq@seecs.edu.pk> wrote:
Dear Dev
Greetings from Pakistan. Just a quick comment. Being a part of NextGen myself, I feel the portion of How to Engage needs a little more work, because in the end that's what we all want from NextGen right?
To give you an example, thankfully you'll find people from technical, law, policy, civil society background in NextGen. So I think, we need to include one more slide that has 2 columns, 1 for the name of the stakeholder group and next to it the WGs that fall into that category, not all but maybe some. It will be a lot convenient. I can see the link to WGs on slide, but trust me when I say this, a lot of youth today wont bother going to the website and then surf and search and read mission statements and purpose of WGs to find a suitable place (unless you are an ICANN addict like myself), compared to when they already know which WGs fall under their stakeholder affiliation which they can quickly jot down without having to download the whole presentation. The sole purpose of 'Engagement' won't be as effective as we would want it to be.
I hope you get my point and will consider it in your final version.
Thanking in anticipation.
Adeel Sadiq Pakistan
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh < devtee@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
A preliminary draft of the At-Large presentation for the At-Large meeting with the Nextgen students at ICANN57 can be found at
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_
Vrdx-PiU1zEEW4/edit?usp=sharing
Its based on the presentation done for the At-Large-Nextgen meeting at ICANN56 I've put some comments for possible improvements but wanted to share now to get additional suggestions from you all.
Dev Anand _______________________________________________ Alac-sc-outreach mailing list Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
Thank you Dev for sharing the presentation. I have some proposals of modification: Page 6: Change the first para in this way: Any Internet End User Group or Group that supports the interests of individual end users can be a part of the At-Large Community. These include: Page 10: First para: replace « represent » by « defend » Page 11: second para: At-Large Community members may draft position statements, comment on draft statements and propose there drafts to the ALAC, and engage in ….. Page 14: Last para: ….. such as the SSAC, GNSO, ccNSO and GAC Page 15: First para: Replace « core mission » by « main activities » Page 16: replace the text by the list of At-Large Working Groups ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114 +216 52 385 114 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 22 oct. 2016 à 21:09, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee@gmail.com> a écrit :
Dear All,
A preliminary draft of the At-Large presentation for the At-Large meeting with the Nextgen students at ICANN57 can be found at
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zFhDZ3m3mFyubb1crnVdqwmfBXU7_Vrdx-Pi...
Its based on the presentation done for the At-Large-Nextgen meeting at ICANN56 I've put some comments for possible improvements but wanted to share now to get additional suggestions from you all.
Dev Anand _______________________________________________ Alac-sc-outreach mailing list Alac-sc-outreach@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-sc-outreach
participants (3)
-
Adeel Sadiq -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Tijani BEN JEMAA