Jan. 13, 2014
6:23 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>wrote:
Thus far, the panel's work has focused on existing programs that ICANN is currently engaged in, that can qualify under public responsibility. I am pasting below the segment in our working document that touches on the definition.
So, is it just me interpreting this to mean the thinking here suggests definitions must be 'shoehorned' into an existing [operational] framework? Seems like the very definition of navel gazing...... -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================