Sorry if I misstated. I did not mean to say that UA is not a problem, just that: - For Latin-script gTLDs, UA is primarily a problem for the domain industry but is of little urgency for end users - For non-Latin script gTLDs the problem is more important and ought to be addressed because of years of neglect. But let's not get caught up in hyperbole that calls this a massive innovation - Hampering the progress of UA is that its slowness to arrive has already forced alternatives to emerge, and these alternatives are already established and succeeding This is clearly of more interest (and urgency) in the IDN world because it has been so long in coming. However my larger point is that, given the success rate of ICANN in its previous remedial repair programs, ICANN itself might not be the best driver of a good UA program, especially in AP and EMEA. - Evan