Dear Evan, thanks for your full support. I think that at this stage (and both Alan and Avri are welcome to contradict me if they feel I am wrong) the input from Rinalia holds as much weight with or without a formal Statement. All input is considered evenly by the ATRT2 and many of the concerns which Rinalia has expressed have been also expressed by other people. I fully expect the ATRT2 to take Rinalia's input very seriously indeed, just like all input the ATRT2 has received is considered very seriously. Kind regards, Olivier On 27/08/2013 23:19, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
My only comment is "I wish I had said all that".
I heartily support the statement. If it would add value I would easily call for formal ALAC endorsement without changing a word.
Spectacular work, Rinalia.
On 27 August 2013 12:14, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Rinalia's message is attached. Any further comments to the ATRT should be sent to <input-to-atrt2@icann.org>. Quickly.
Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html