Thanks Sebastien for this and for your suggestion. Congratulations to Olivier and to all those who made possible ATLAS II. Best Regards, Fatima 2014-09-12 18:13 GMT-03:00 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>:
Thanks Sebastien.
I figured you were among them. Truly appreciate that gesture.
I posit now that a resolution be passed at an appropriate time by the ALAC to acknowledge your unstinting service to the ATLAS agenda at the Board level.
-Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Sébastien Bachollet < sebastien@bachollet.com> wrote:
Hello Evan, Thanks for your question.
I am one of the 3. (I don't know what is public or not, then I will not put their name here and talk on their behalf.)
And my suggestion was to add the following text: and will study possible plans to make the At-Large summit a regular occurrence.
May I suggest that in the work currently done by At-Large to << explain >> the declaration, to add the idea (request, demande...) of a regular occurrence of ATLAS, as a conclusion?
Ready to answer other question and to help. All the best
Sébastien Bachollet +33 6 07 66 89 33 Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/ Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@bachollet.com>
De : Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> Date : vendredi 12 septembre 2014 17:26 À : Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@bachollet.com> Cc : At-Large Worldwide <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, ALAC Working List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Objet : Re: [ALAC] Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for forwarding this.
Note: Three voting members of the Board abstained from voting on the [ATLASII] resolutions. They stated for the record that they were supportive of the work resulting from the ATLAS, but wanted to draw attention to their encouragement for the Board to take future consideration of plans to develop the ATLAS into a regularly occurring event.
Could you please offer any more detail on this?
Does this indicate that some of the Board members did not agree that the Board should just accept the ATLAS results, but also to confirm it as a recurring event? Or am I interpreting this incorrectly?
Thanks!
- Evan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero