Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] Reference: ICC Ruling on Objections filed by the ALAC

I generally agree with Alejandro (minus accusation of cheating), especially on the need for analysis and drawing of lessons learned to benefit follow up and future At-Large action. A review of the process would be useful. For example, recommendations could be made on whether the ICC panel should include more than 1 person and whether some kind of briefing on the context of ICANN, its ecosystem and processes should be incorporated as part of the panel preparation. The review ideally should include the sub groups that worked on the criteria for objections as well as the development of arguments/substantiation. Best regards, Rinalia