Hi Leon Careful - you may be pressed into service. As I have already said, the issues revolve around Whois information (Clause 3.3.1 RAA), what is published and who has access. And what we don’t need is yet another group looking at the same issues. So - again - PLEASE confine the review terms of reference Holly On 10 Jan 2017, at 8:03 am, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:
Thanks Alan,
If the case is that the review would be looking at the same issues that the WG would, then I would support reducing the scope as we did with the CCWG in order to avoid duplicative efforts.
In any case I put my work where my mouth is and should there be the need to join the RDS WG, count me in.
Best regards,
León
El 09/01/2017, a las 00:08, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
To be clear, the issue was never staff support. The reduced scope came from the volunteer community because of the worry that the same people who were working on other RDS-related work (and particularly the GNSO PDP) would be the ones to best serve on this RT.
That is largely the same logic used by the CCWG-Accountability for suggesting that the scope of ATRT3 be reduced.
I'm not arguing for or against, just wanted to make sure we are all on the same page.
Alan
At 09/01/2017 12:28 AM, León Felipe Sánchez AmbÃa wrote:
I agree with Tijani. The widened scope seems justified although it will surely require more staff support.
Kind regards,
León
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El ene. 8, 2017, a las 11:02 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA < tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com> escribió:
Alan,
I understand the issue of bandwidth but would accept the GNSO proposal because of the merit of the wide scope. In our comment we should note that we support the wide scope assuming that more time and more staff support would be provided to the review team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114 +216 52 385 114 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 9 janv. 2017 à 05:07, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > a écrit :
I am attaching a document from the GNSO on the proposed RDS (formerly WHOIS) Review to be started very soon.
You will recall that we previously had approved a narrowing of the scope of the RDS Review to focus just on the extent to which the previous WHOIS Review Recommendations had been implemented. This GNSO proposal widens the scope considerably. Although there is no question that the wider scope is interesting and ptentially useful, it will also require far more community involvement that the earlier proposal.
The call for volunteers was to close on 13 January and a decision needs to be made quickly on exactly what the Review should be.
Comments please, with some urgency.
Alan
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> Subject: Re: RDS Review Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:42:53 +0000
Dear Karen and Community Leaders
The GNSO Council, working wiith its component Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, has produced this document (attached), which outlines our feedback and concerns with the proposed âlimited scopeâ for the upcominoming RDS review. The document was submitted to ICANN Staff, and sharing with this team for your reference.
Thank you,
J. ---------------- James Bladel GNSO Chair <GNSO Council feedback on RDS.pdf>_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)