Since these are modifications for clarity, I'll suggest one more. One bothered me and I now have a better idea how to express what it was. *"If the Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong support were implemented, there is no assurance that they form a cohesive and consistent set of policies."* I recall this statement being questioned by members of the working group, for it is difficult to parse. What I believe it intended is that the selection of resolutions that achieved Consensus are not together reflective of a single approach to the issue, and in some cases the statements that apparently have Consensus even seem to contradict each other. In light of this, I suggest this re-working of the line that is clearer and more direct to the point. *"The collection of Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong support, taken as a whole, do not **form a cohesive and consistent set of policies"* Thanks, - Evan