Dear Alan. Before talk about ROP changes, is neccessary as I said in last november, to decide first if Ex Com is a good idea. I think particularly to impose "de facto" a new body, with only a few ALAC members deciding for all of us, and in charge to decide what issues are urgent or important is not a democratic way to stablish something like that. But, I repeat, first of all is not legaly, because are not into ROP, and because was not voted the necessity of it creation. my best Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:57:53 -0500 To: alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org From: alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca Subject: [ALAC] Rules of Procedure (RoP) re-write
We are clearly not going to have any time to discuss this as a group in Mexico City, but I would like to ask all of you to think about what you believe needs to be changed in any way. We have already identified: Rules associated with the ExCom and Performance Guidelines, but input on those is certainly welcome.
I am also interested in hearing how detailed and exhaustive you believe the RoP should be.
Input is welcome via e-mail (privately or to the list) and in person while in Mexico City.
You can find the current version ALAC/2007/1/1.Rev10 in English French and Spanish at https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?rules_of_procedure.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
_________________________________________________________________ ¿Aburrido? Ingresá ya y divertite como nunca en MSN Juegos. http://juegos.ar.msn.com/