March 29, 2010
3:43 p.m.
On 29 March 2010 06:32, Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@vande-walle.eu> wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:56:03 +0900, Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
[ on creating a formalized, accountable root zone]
Yes, but should (could) ICANN take on that role? Would we trust it?
Right now, for lack of a better forum, ICANN seems to be the only place to address that.
You're both right. ICANN is by far the most logically suitable steward. But there is legitimate concern about ICANN's competence at doing so, given its track record at handling its existing mandate. - Evan