We have been discussing WGs for ages. The At-Large Review now makes it essential that we take definitive action to clarify WG (under a variety of names) status. At the meeting, we will discuss the groups and my hope is we will take action. Attached is a chart of all groups with their current status (after Evin's Wiki Workspace review and cleanup) and my proposed "strawperson" - an idea to be discussed, adopted, or altered. Also attached is a mission statement for two of the groups that ws previously distributed and I think agreed upon. Some definitions for strawperson words: Membership: Annual review of membership and removal of those no longer active. May involve leadership review of membership and/or mailing lists and/or e-mail confirmations from some/all. Archive: Wiki stays. Marked as Archived. mailing list Archives stay, Mailing list disabled. SME: Subject Matter Expert - no need to a full WG, but need to identify one or more SME to handles questions or issues. Mailing list: No need to a group that meets, but maintain a mailing list for discussion. Repopulate: Groups that have full or partial membership selected by ALAC/RALOs or by office.2