The Bigpulse page for an ALAS vote currently looks like this: 1. Should the regional advise from NARALO for applicant (114) Foundation for Building Sustainable Communities (FBSC) be rejected? The regional advise was to accept the application. Voting "No" means that you would like to accept this application. __ No 100% __ Yes No votes (with the 100% and "No votes" in a smaller, non-bold font) I understand how we got here, but I have a very strong feeling that voting NO to accept an ALAS (that is, voting No to "not reject") is both counter intuitive and bad grammar! Can we please schedule a SHORT discussion in Cairo to decide if I am in a minority, or if we should reverse the wording. That is, to vote on deciding to admit or not, with the regional advice CLEARLY being shown at the top of the poll. Voting on whether to ACCEPT the regional advice would be a LITTLE clearer, but I still prefer voting on whether to accept the ALS. Alan PS I also find the sequence of Yes No on the second line less then clear. As stated before, I would prefer to not see the voting summary in this screen, but to be able to, at the click of a button, to see who voted and how.