On 28 Feb 2013, at 15:04, Alan Greenberg wrote:
Do you have any specific wording recommendations to change it to make it clearer or more self-consistent?
In response to your comments, I would suggest that the opening sentence read "On the whole, the ALAC does not believe that unlimited closed generics provide public benefit."
How about: "On the whole, the ALAC cannot determine whether an unlimited closed generics provide public benefits." Though even this seems exaggerated. Why are we talking about unlimited closed generics. I thought we were talking about a very finite number. In fact a relatively small number. Has ALAC really determined that a small number of closed generics are not in the public interest? How was this determined? If indeed it was determined, we should describe how? Perhaps a truer statement might be: The current belief of some in ALAC is that the small number of closed generics may not be in the public interest. avri