Izumi, I may be wrong on this, but it is my impression that the at-large list and at-large wg lists are open to anyone interested, not just ALSes Patrick Izumi AIZU wrote, On 3/11/08 17:59:
I still prefer Option 2, allowing multiple channels, while, ALAC can still remain as a major channel for indivdual Internet users to ICANN process.
As for the definition or distinction, first of all we should stick with the word "individual Internet users", not just "users" or "end-users". That is inline with what Jacquline wrote. To me, "individual Internet user" mean those users who are using the Internet for himself or herself, but not for the organization or group he or she is enaged. Still not clear, I know.... but that the sort of dillemma we all are facing.
I also like to see some additional mechanism to allow individuals participate in AtLarge activities in substantial manner without belonging to any ALS, let alone RALO. That does not mean that person will get voting right for ArLarge related elections, but voices for policy issues.
izumi
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
-- Patrick Vande Walle Check my blog: http://patrick.vande-walle.eu