Sept. 20, 2012
2:08 a.m.
Not sure how clear I made it, and it is even clearer after a RC/IOC DT meeting today, the temporary reserving of the names is recommended ONLY if the GNSO initiated a PDP. Without that pre-requisite, I don't think that this compromise position would make it out of the DT. We are not the only ones who have some doubts about this entire mess. Alan At 19/09/2012 09:31 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
I will hold my nose and support the position Alan outlined. On condition that if the PDP comes as he thinks, we go to the mattresses for delinking....and even reversal.
- Carlton