Thanks Yrjö, that's helpful to know. For those of you who were not around at the time of Durban, the GAC included advice on their Durban communiqué about this thanks to a concerted push from SSAC & ALAC. Kindest regards, Olivier On 13/07/2016 16:40, Yrjö Länsipuro wrote:
Hi all,
At the GAC-SSAC meeting in Helsinki (Thursday, 30 June), after Patrik explained why SSAC was going to issue 083, there was some discussion on whether the dotless domain issue should be mentioned in the GAC Helsinki communiqué. However it was pointed out that GAC already took up the matter in its Durban (2013) communiqué ("The GAC Advises the ICANN Board to: a. As a matter of urgency consider the recommendations contained in the SSAC Report on Dotless Domains (SAC053) and Internal Name Certificates (SAC057)"). Most countries that took the floor felt it was not necessary to repeat the advice in Helsinki communiqué.
Best,
Yrjö
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:39 PM *To:* Alan Greenberg; Julie Hammer *Cc:* ALAC ExCom; ALAC Working List *Subject:* Re: [ALAC] Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement Workspace
Thanks Julie. Understood GAC was quite concerned also and SSAC report guess put a final point in this matter.
*/Vanda Scartezini/*
*/Polo Consultores Associados/*
*/Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004/*
*/01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil/*
*/Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253/*
*/Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 /*
*/Sorry for any typos. /*
*From: *<alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> *Date: *Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 11:07 AM *To: *Julie Hammer <julie.hammer@bigpond.com> *Cc: *ALAC ExCom <alac-excom@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, 'ALAC List' <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [ALAC] Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement Workspace
Excellent. Thanks Julie. Alan
At 11/07/2016 05:00 PM, Julie Hammer wrote:
Hi Alan,
Tha SSAC Comment (SAC083 <https://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents <https://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents>>) on the proposed amendments, specifically on the issue of dotless domains, has now been published. I have attached it for your info but not sure if the attachment will go through to the list.
Cheers, Julie
On 11 Jul 2016, at 5:59 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
For those of you who do not "follow" all of our Wiki pages, please note the comment I made today on the Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement.
When I and others first reviewed the amendments, we did not find much to comment on. In conversations during and after Helsinki (with both At-Large people and those from other parts of ICANN), it became more obvious (to me) that there are several issues that need to be raised - forcefully.
The comment period officially ends this coming Wednesday, but I have asked for a week's extension. We should hear tomorrow whether this is granted.
The registry agreement governs the core of one of ICANN's main areas of responsibility. Please look at the comments at https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw <https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw> and circulate as appropriate.
If there is no extension granted, we will have to act very quickly, so please let us know if you, in general or in detail, support the ALAC making such a comment.
Alan (taking time out from a great and peaceful vacation in Finland, so you have some idea of the importance I put on this)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA... <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28A...> )
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_B1E6F731-8118-4AB5-AFE4-C6D09C84FD9B" X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==
Hi Alan,
Tha SSAC Comment (SAC083 <https://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents>) on the proposed amendments, specifically on the issue of dotless domains, has now been published. I have attached it for your info but not sure if the attachment will go through to the list.
Cheers, Julie
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="sac-083-en.pdf" Content-Type: application/pdf; x-unix-mode=0644; name="sac-083-en.pdf" X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;SN1PR0301MB2030;9:HUR3tgA1fpHFc2ZHQ3cMQS1h1G5Y8VvAbMd339l9f1SRY9fI1VY7Lgme+BOBDyB2VVNdTLcKa8BcVe5ua8aEO/U5iGznOFPi4kphMtftNxqMEIWUQpufQxpgesM7Zfgr7XQie1syKvmiuk41uD3bbbTv8fcOcSxkXhRf5l4vGX8UayUQoBsroW6JfFvvbMX3wNQD8ujAU1K4qbpfj02pSg==
On 11 Jul 2016, at 5:59 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> > wrote:
For those of you who do not "follow" all of our Wiki pages, please note the comment I made today on the Proposed Amendments to Base New gTLD Registry Agreement.
When I and others first reviewed the amendments, we did not find much to comment on. In conversations during and after Helsinki (with both At-Large people and those from other parts of ICANN), it became more obvious (to me) that there are several issues that need to be raised - forcefully.
The comment period officially ends this coming Wednesday, but I have asked for a week's extension. We should hear tomorrow whether this is granted.
The registry agreement governs the core of one of ICANN's main areas of responsibility. Please look at the comments at https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw <https://community.icann.org/x/uBiOAw> and circulate as appropriate.
If there is no extension granted, we will have to act very quickly, so please let us know if you, in general or in detail, support the ALAC making such a comment.
Alan (taking time out from a great and peaceful vacation in Finland, so you have some idea of the importance I put on this)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA... <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28A...> )
_______________________________________________ ALAC-ExCom mailing list ALAC-ExCom@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-excom