Hi Alan I am happy with the draft response - it answers all the questions (and, sadly, repeats what we have already said). My immediate response to the GNSO is to stop delaying yet again and just get on with it!. But the draft response you have provided is so much nicer - and I am happy for it to be sent. Holly On 10/01/2013, at 10:15 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
As you will see from the following message, the Whois-WG has not yet commented on this draft statement, but due to the tight timing, I am sending it to the entire ALAC as well.
Alan
To: Whois-WG <whois-wg@atlarge-lists.icann.org> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Subject: Thick Whois
ALAC input was requested by the ongoing GNSO PDP on mandating a Thick Whois for all registries. Although previous ALAC statements made it clear that we were strongly in support of Thick Whois, we had not specifically addressed all of the issues being discussed in the WG.
A draft reply can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/kIVZAg.
Comments welcome, but note that the target reply date was today. I have said that ALAC would be responding but that we would be late, but quick action would be appreciated.
A copy is also attached here for your convenience.
Alan
<ALAC-PDP-Input-v02.pdf>_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)