If we're truly bottom up, we should not follow a pattern (even in formality) of having the staff lead ------Original Message------ From: Alan Greenberg To: gbruen@knujon.com To: Ariel Liang To: ALAC Subject: Re: [ALAC] Call for Volunteers to Review Two Public Comment Proceedings Sent: Nov 6, 2015 15:25 In the past, such messages would generally start with "On behalf of Alan Greenberg, Chair of the At-Large Advisory Committee..." I find that too wordy (and a bit pompous). But if you think that omitting it is confusing, it can be added back. Alan At 06/11/2015 03:08 PM, gbruen@knujon.com wrote:
I am confused. Is staff or ALAC calling for this? Who is the "we"?
Thanks
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message----- From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Sender: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 20:04:54 To: alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org<alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: Alan Greenberg<alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Subject: [ALAC] Call for Volunteers to Review Two Public Comment Proceedings
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry