Thank you Alan and Andrei for the updates. Please excuse my newcomer confusion - not meaning to stir the pot here - but I'm wondering how close At-Large's/ALAC's position is to that of the SSAC? Do we agree with their report 100%? My initial thinking is that representing users, we might want a somewhat more diversified approach than that offered by the SSAC, ensuring full GDPR compliance (I'm happy to elaborate if needed). Also, would it make sense to take on the positions of other communities in our statement, if only for the sake of future consensus building? As already briefly mentioned to Alan, I'm happy to help with the drafting if needed. Best to all, Joanna Kulesza -------------------------------- Joanna Kulesza, PhD assistant professor of international law and Internet governance Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland publications: https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/ website: https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna wt., 28 sie 2018 o 08:27 Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> napisał(a):
As I mentioned on the ALAC call that has just completed, all EPDP participant groups have been given the opportunity to provide "early input" into the EPDP.
So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their input can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ.
The SSAC's input consisted of their recent report SAC101. A copy is attached for your convenience.
I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a statement saying that we support SAC101, as it is in line with our stated position of trying to ensure that security professionals and law enforcement have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.
I open the floor for discussion and will initiate a Consensus Call later in the week.
Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)