Holly, may be worth saying, but it does not really fit into the questions being asked or the mandate of this PDP. Alan At 14/01/2013 05:59 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
Hi Alan
Sorry not to comment earlier. Is it worth saying that the current work being done by the IETF to develop WEIRDS will allow tiered access to Whois data - recognising the legitimate need of individuals and organisations for not having their details made public,while addressing legitimate needs of the LEAs for access to Whois information?
Holly
On 15/01/2013, at 9:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
I have revised the reply to the Thick Whois PDP WQ (https://community.icann.org/x/kIVZAg) based on a suggestion from Evan on competition, and one issue raised by Michele Neylon on local law violation (not in the form of a suggestion, but an issue that merits ALAC comment).
The Wiki points to both a redline version showing the changes and a final version.
Given that there have been no negative comments to the original statement, and additional changes submitted during the last few days, I request that Olivier initiate a formal vote on this document.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)