Dear AtLarge, here is my first few para for the Second part of our response to the Board Governance Working Group Report on AtLarge Review. * On Effectiveness and participation * *4. Educating and engaging the ALSs should be an immediate priority; compliance should be a longer term goal. * We agree that there is a good room to improve the participation of ALSs in our RALO and AtLarge activities. For that reason, we have been working very hard to organize the Summit – a global meeting of all ALSs to come to one place together. We also note that it is very important for us to continue our outreach work to recruit more new ALSs, and also explore ways to setup a mechanism where individuals who have keen interest in ICANN policy areas while she or he may not have strong interest in joining any of the existing ALSs with good reasons. To achieve these, we hope that ICANN continue to provide sufficient resources. *5. ALAC should develop strategic and operational plans (including performance criteria and cost information) as part of ICANN's planning process * We agree that it is worth to consider developing Strategic and Operational Plans as suggested in WG Report. We like to work out the specific details in coming months. We also note and support that in the Independent Review Report, there were two recommendations *6. More effort needs to be put into developing accurate cost models for At Large activity * Together with the Recommendation 4 of the Independent Review Report "ICANN should implement on activity-based costing system", we support the idea of having cost model based on AtLarge activities. In fact, we advocate more transparency than current budget information on AtLarge activities. We also like to see clear distinction be made between specific AtLarge related costs and general ICANN out reach activity costs which benefits all ICANN constituencies, not specific to AtLarge. We also agree with the comments of WG Report on the Recommendation 5 of the Independent Review Report - while we need sufficient resource support to ALAC activities, we like specific ways on how to allocate the budget be left to the consultation and negotiation between ALAC Chair and ICANN staff. [Comments on Points 7 to 9 will come later]