Alan Greenberg wrote:
The problem for ALAC members is not likely for the regions that have only one candidate listed, but for those that have two!
*sigh* - Two candidates put themselves forward. - Their bios and nomination statements are openly available - We held a Bigpulse vote to indicate RALO member interest. - We didn't have a NARALO meeting in time (for the ALAC deadline) to choose one so we put forth both - However, the results of the regional preference are open (and, in this case, reasonably decisive) We considered the process to be transparent and democratic as possible, considering that technically our preference is only advice. What's the problem? If ALAC just wants to rubber stamp the regional preference -- and dislikes actually having to make a decision -- then why have ALAC involved in the process at all? - Evan