URGENT CONSENSUS CALL: IANA Stewardship CWG Face-to-Face meeting
There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg). ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time, We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time. At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend. We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world). 1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised. 2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing. CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum. Alan
Dear Alan, My answer to both questions is YES Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 24/10/2014, a las 13:12, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg).
ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time,
We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time.
At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend.
We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world).
1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised.
2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing.
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Thank you Leon. Just to be clear, I had to select some default for the first question, but I was not trying to lead anyone in which way they decide. Other ALAC members, please send your replies either to the list or directly to me. Alan
Dear Alan,
My answer to both questions is YES
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 24/10/2014, a las 13:12, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to
choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO
CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
By now, I may have been deemed to have answered yes to both - but just to confirm - yes to both Holly On 25 Oct 2014, at 7:27 am, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:
Dear Alan,
My answer to both questions is YES
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 24/10/2014, a las 13:12, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg).
ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time,
We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time.
At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend.
We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world).
1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised.
2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing.
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Nope. The world is round, and it is the start of the weekend. I not THAT unreasonable! ;-) Deeming will not take place for a while yet. Alan At 24/10/2014 06:44 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:
By now, I may have been deemed to have answered yes to both - but just to confirm - yes to both
Holly On 25 Oct 2014, at 7:27 am, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> wrote:
Dear Alan,
My answer to both questions is YES
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 24/10/2014, a las 13:12, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg).
ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time,
We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time.
At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend.
We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world).
1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised.
2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing.
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Hi Alan, I agree with your 2 proposals; So yes for both. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: + 216 41 649 605 Mobile: + 216 98 330 114 Fax: + 216 70 853 376 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- -----Message d'origine----- De : alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Alan Greenberg Envoyé : vendredi 24 octobre 2014 19:12 À : ALAC Cc : Seun Ojedeji Objet : [ALAC] URGENT CONSENSUS CALL: IANA Stewardship CWG Face-to-Face meeting Importance : Haute There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg). ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time, We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time. At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend. We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world). 1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised. 2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing. CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C) --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com
Hi Alan, A few thoughts before ALAC proceeds on this. First we were selected through a process and have been participating in the a CWG with some background and thought process. Allocating a person to go instead of those of us that can't acquire the visa though (I still think this meeting could be held in the US or Dubai because most would have their visas from the LA meeting or Dubai is simpler to get a visa) and the CWG has been highly insensitive to not have a consensus call on the venue, should be appointed with our consultation otherwise we should continue to participate remotely. A replacement cannot build the same context and represent my community perspective. I would rather agree to Olivier to be there in my place rather than someone to fill in proxy for me! Thanks FouD On Friday, 24 October 2014, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg).
ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time,
We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time.
At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend.
We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world).
1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised.
2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing.
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-- Regards. -------------------------- Fouad Bajwa ICT4D and Internet Governance Advisor My Blog: Internet's Governance: http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/ Follow my Tweets: http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
I hope this reaches you all safely.. but yes yes. :) Maureen -----Original Message----- From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Friday, 24 October 2014 8:12 a.m. To: ALAC Cc: Seun Ojedeji Subject: [ALAC] URGENT CONSENSUS CALL: IANA Stewardship CWG Face-to-Face meeting Importance: High There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg). ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time, We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time. At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend. We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world). 1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised. 2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing. CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C)
Yes to both. -ed On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
There will be a face-to-face (F2F) meeting of the IANA Stewardship CWG in Frankfurt on November 19-20. The meeting is open to all current Members and Participants of the CWG (https://community.icann.org/x/1QrxAg).
ICANN is funding the participation of Members. The only exception is that if a Member cannot attend, they will fund a current Participant if they are approved by the SO/AC (an "Alternate"). The ALAC also requires that anyone participating must be a current member of the IANA-issues group and mailing list. Additionally, it is crucial that any Alternate selected have participated in the At-Large and CWG meetings/calls. And obviously, the person must be able to travel to Germany which excludes some people who cannot obtain a visa in such a short time,
We must notify ICANN of the selection of any Alternate by next Tuesday, October 28. That does not leave very much time.
At this stage, it is likely that two of our five representatives on the CWG may not be able to attend.
We have two questions that must be addressed immediately (and I am conscious that it is already Friday evening or Saturday in much of the world).
1. Do we select an Alternate only from the same region as the regular Member who cannot attend? The argument against is that it puts into question our rationale for having 5 members to represent all ICANN regions. The arguments for it is that may allow us to find the best person to sit at the table on our behalf, it is only a temporary replacement, and so far there have not been a lot of regional differences raised.
2. Who makes the decision of who, if anyone, to send. I would suggest that the ALT is the only practical answer given the timing.
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
ALAC Members: If you are silent, you are deemed to have answered YES to both questions, but it would be *FAR* better if we get actual answers from everyone, and preferably we should have quorum.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
As demanded , here my options: CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 10/25/14, 16:38, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
Dear Alan, All, I realize that I answered only to Alan. My answer to both questions is YES. In first place I would prefer that we can find a replacement from the same region of the member of the group that cannot attend but if we don't have qualified candidates from the same region, I will be fine with a qualified candidate from a different region. About the second question, I would prefer a consensus from ALAC members about the name of person who replace the member who cannot attend. Then if we cannot reach consensus, I think ALT should select the names of replacement. Thanks Alan for raising this important issue. Best Regards, Fatima 2014-10-26 14:35 GMT-03:00 Vanda Scartezini <vanda@uol.com.br>:
As demanded , here my options:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES
Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.
On 10/25/14, 16:38, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero
Hi I did as Fatima in response to the call and my response was YES to both G Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight . On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Fatima Cambronero < fatimacambronero@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alan, All,
I realize that I answered only to Alan.
My answer to both questions is YES.
In first place I would prefer that we can find a replacement from the same region of the member of the group that cannot attend but if we don't have qualified candidates from the same region, I will be fine with a qualified candidate from a different region.
About the second question, I would prefer a consensus from ALAC members about the name of person who replace the member who cannot attend. Then if we cannot reach consensus, I think ALT should select the names of replacement.
Thanks Alan for raising this important issue.
Best Regards,
Fatima
2014-10-26 14:35 GMT-03:00 Vanda Scartezini <vanda@uol.com.br>:
As demanded , here my options:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES
Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.
On 10/25/14, 16:38, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina
Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Dear Alan, My response is yes for the 2 questions. Best regards Hadja 2014-10-26 21:56 GMT+00:00 Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>:
Hi I did as Fatima in response to the call and my response was YES to both G
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Fatima Cambronero < fatimacambronero@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alan, All,
I realize that I answered only to Alan.
My answer to both questions is YES.
In first place I would prefer that we can find a replacement from the same region of the member of the group that cannot attend but if we don't have qualified candidates from the same region, I will be fine with a qualified candidate from a different region.
About the second question, I would prefer a consensus from ALAC members about the name of person who replace the member who cannot attend. Then if we cannot reach consensus, I think ALT should select the names of replacement.
Thanks Alan for raising this important issue.
Best Regards,
Fatima
2014-10-26 14:35 GMT-03:00 Vanda Scartezini <vanda@uol.com.br>:
As demanded , here my options:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES
Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.
On 10/25/14, 16:38, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:
CONSENSUS CALL 1: Should the ALAC be able to choose any qualified person, regardless of region? YES or NO CONSENSUS CALL 2: Should the ALT be empowered to select Alternates for this F2F meeting on behalf of the ALAC? YES or NO
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina
Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Hadja OUATTARA / SANON Conseiller Technique Ministère du Développement de l'Economie Numérique et des Postes Administrateur des TIC - CAPES SG Fondation Femme, TIC et Développement Durable Présidente Initiative TIC & Citoyenneté Cell. : +22670231399 / +22677371637
participants (11)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Eduardo Diaz -
Fatima Cambronero -
Fouad Bajwa -
Glenn McKnight -
Hadja OUATTARA/ SANON -
Holly Raiche -
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía -
Maureen Hilyard -
Tijani BEN JEMAA -
Vanda Scartezini