Good news indeed. Now, wouldn't ICANN have saved us all a lot of grief by doing this in the first place? On 22 November 2012 10:05, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:

FYI. Alan

...

From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@icann.org] Sent: 22 November 2012 10:26 To: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com) Subject: URS update

Dear Jonathan,

The deadline for responses to the URS RFI has passed and I'm happy to inform you that we have received several responses which we are now evaluating. Moreover, my first impression is that the situation looks quite promising, both in terms of adherence to the URS text and regarding the target fee. This also means that there is less of an urgency than I previously thought to convene a drafting team (and I'm glad to have been proven wrong in that regard!). There may still be details where such a drafting team can provide useful guidance and I will get back to you with further updates on this and other URS matters as we advance with the evaluations.

Very best regards

Olof

---

ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)

-- Evan Leibovitch Toronto Canada Em: evan at telly dot org Sk: evanleibovitch Tw: el56