A reference to enforcement is made in the request, but enforcement is NOT an issue that can be fixed by a PDP. But it is EXACTLY the kind of thing that that ALAC should use its "Advice to the Board" channel for. And to be useful it does need to be thoughtfully worded and include a "catalogue of ICANN's wishy-washy enforcement of its own rules", not just in relation to this particular problem, but in a wider sense. And it should make concrete implementable suggestions regarding how to fix the problem (perhaps as a attachment). Alan At 23/10/2008 04:59 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:

Still unable to shake the view formed by logic and the facts recited in the preamble to the request for the report; the optimal response is a memorandum from ALAC to the Board cataloguing ICANN's wishy-washy enforcement of its own rules and encouraging them to get busy and hold somebody accountable.

Carlton