ICANN Announcement on Domain Tasting
Please see the announcement and report (<http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm) ICANN posted today about the impact of the AGP Budget Provision and the AGP Limits Policy on Domain Tasting. In short, the changes are dramatic. There were 17,668750 AGP deletes in June 2008. Following the ICANN budget levy on excessive deletes, the number decreased to 2,785,605. With the implementation of the AGP limit policy in April 2009, the total number of AGP deletes was 58,218, an overall decrease of 99.7%. Put another way, in June 2008, for .COM, there were 2,122,794 net new domains added, and an additional 15,738,292 domain names added and then AGP-deleted for an AGP delete rate of 741% In April 2009, there were 2,084,868 net new domains added, and an additional 37,519 domain names added and then AGP-deleted for an AGP delete rate of under 2%. Under the policy, an AGP-delete rate of 10% is allowed without financial penalty, per registrar, to allow for exceptional conditions. It was expected that few registrars would exceed this 10% and in fact in April only 22 registrars exceeded 10%, and there were only 432 excessive AGP-deletes. As the organization that started this entire policy process, At-Large and ALAC can be proud of the results. Alan
The report gives credit to the GNSO for developing the policy, which is correct as the GNSO voted to initiate a policy development process, formed a working group (with At-Large participation), and ultimately approved the resultant policy and recommended that the Board support it. All of that was driven off of an Issues Report investigating Domain tasting and that Issues Report was created at the request of the ALAC. Domain tasting was an issue that had been discussed for quite some time within ICANN, but the ALAC was the group that forced the question and started to formal process to address Domain Tasting. But once that process was initiated by the ALAC, there was a lot of work, both official and unofficial done by a lot of parties to create the end result. And is should be noted that despite the negative comments raised in this thread about registries, several registries played a large and crucial role in creating the end result. Alan At 12/08/2009 07:01 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
As a matter of fact the document thanks GNSO, not ALAC
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> To: "ALAC Working List" <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2009 8:21:22 AM GMT +12:00 Fiji Subject: [At-Large] ICANN Announcement on Domain Tasting
Please see the announcement and report (<http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm)
ICANN posted today about the impact of the AGP Budget Provision and the AGP Limits Policy on Domain Tasting.
As the organization that started this entire policy process, At-Large and ALAC can be proud of the results.
Alan
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann...
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Indeed the old numbers were indecent! The impact on security was huge as I remember a closed presentation of VeriSign to the board in 2007. Vanda Scartezini POLO Consultores Associados & IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8 01418-903 Sao Paulo,SP. Fone + 55 11 3266.6253 Mob + 5511 8181.1464 -----Original Message----- From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:21 PM To: ALAC Working List; At-Large Worldwide Subject: [At-Large] ICANN Announcement on Domain Tasting Please see the announcement and report (<http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm>http://w ww.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm) ICANN posted today about the impact of the AGP Budget Provision and the AGP Limits Policy on Domain Tasting. In short, the changes are dramatic. There were 17,668750 AGP deletes in June 2008. Following the ICANN budget levy on excessive deletes, the number decreased to 2,785,605. With the implementation of the AGP limit policy in April 2009, the total number of AGP deletes was 58,218, an overall decrease of 99.7%. Put another way, in June 2008, for .COM, there were 2,122,794 net new domains added, and an additional 15,738,292 domain names added and then AGP-deleted for an AGP delete rate of 741% In April 2009, there were 2,084,868 net new domains added, and an additional 37,519 domain names added and then AGP-deleted for an AGP delete rate of under 2%. Under the policy, an AGP-delete rate of 10% is allowed without financial penalty, per registrar, to allow for exceptional conditions. It was expected that few registrars would exceed this 10% and in fact in April only 22 registrars exceeded 10%, and there were only 432 excessive AGP-deletes. As the organization that started this entire policy process, At-Large and ALAC can be proud of the results. Alan _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann .org At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Dear All.: As ALAC member, and part of Domaing Tasting WG, and in my particular case as member of South American NGO we are who presented an statement about this some time ago. I'm so proud at this moment - a priori - in relation with the ICANN's desition taken by on AGP matter. We presented timely an statement where we asked for a fast AGP elimination. For that we are at the begining so happy with this measure, but we have reservations about their effective implementation. We are in according with comments who talk about we were who subsidized to who abuse with domaing tasting, and for that, we want to know how these companies would be punish, or how we could obtain a redress from these companies, and if ICANN had thought about this. buscar Carlos Dionisio AguirreInternational Director of AGEIA DENSI http://ar.ageiadensi.org
From: vanda@uol.com.br To: at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:35:22 -0300 Subject: Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] ICANN Announcement on Domain Tasting
Indeed the old numbers were indecent! The impact on security was huge as I remember a closed presentation of VeriSign to the board in 2007.
Vanda Scartezini POLO Consultores Associados & IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8 01418-903 Sao Paulo,SP. Fone + 55 11 3266.6253 Mob + 5511 8181.1464
-----Original Message----- From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 5:21 PM To: ALAC Working List; At-Large Worldwide Subject: [At-Large] ICANN Announcement on Domain Tasting
Please see the announcement and report (<http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm>http://w ww.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-12aug09-en.htm) ICANN posted today about the impact of the AGP Budget Provision and the AGP Limits Policy on Domain Tasting.
In short, the changes are dramatic. There were 17,668750 AGP deletes in June 2008. Following the ICANN budget levy on excessive deletes, the number decreased to 2,785,605. With the implementation of the AGP limit policy in April 2009, the total number of AGP deletes was 58,218, an overall decrease of 99.7%.
Put another way, in June 2008, for .COM, there were 2,122,794 net new domains added, and an additional 15,738,292 domain names added and then AGP-deleted for an AGP delete rate of 741%
In April 2009, there were 2,084,868 net new domains added, and an additional 37,519 domain names added and then AGP-deleted for an AGP delete rate of under 2%.
Under the policy, an AGP-delete rate of 10% is allowed without financial penalty, per registrar, to allow for exceptional conditions. It was expected that few registrars would exceed this 10% and in fact in April only 22 registrars exceeded 10%, and there were only 432 excessive AGP-deletes.
As the organization that started this entire policy process, At-Large and ALAC can be proud of the results.
Alan
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann .org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
_________________________________________________________________ Mes de la amistad, disfrutalo con MSN Amor y Amistad http://match.ar.msn.com/channel/index.aspx?trackingid=1056241
participants (3)
-
Alan Greenberg -
carlos aguirre -
Vanda Scartezini