"Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan
Alan, I believe that the criteria are sufficient. Regards Alberto De: ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: domingo, 18 de marzo de 2018 05:16 p.m. Para: ALAC <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Dear Alan, Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS. Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots? Regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding.
During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Thanks Alan. I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose. satish On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
*There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. *During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Ok with me. -ed - On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Alan.
I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose.
satish
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
*There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. *During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
Dear Alan, What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"? Regards, Maritza Enviado desde mi iPhone El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com<mailto:eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com>> escribió: Ok with me. -ed - On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com<mailto:sb.inapp@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Alan. I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose. satish On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Alan, Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS. Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots? Regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> escribió: We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) -- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB
Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero@msn.com> a écrit :
Dear Alan,
What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"?
Regards,
Maritza
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com>> escribió:
Ok with me.
-ed
-
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com <mailto:sb.inapp@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Alan.
I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose.
satish
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding.
During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...>
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>-- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
My personal opinion is that with such a small number of slots (perhaps just 1 this meeting), it is preferable to being in new people who have not seen or not often seen an ICANN meeting. That being said, for San Juan, we did manage to at least partially fund past recipients because we ended up with additional slots to re-allocate. Do others think we should favour repeats for a good person over a new person? Alan At 18/03/2018 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet wrote:
Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB
Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <<mailto:myaguero@msn.com>myaguero@msn.com> a écrit :
Dear Alan,
What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"?
Regards,
Maritza
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz <<mailto:eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com>eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> escribió:
Ok with me.
-ed
-
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <<mailto:sb.inapp@gmail.com>sb.inapp@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Alan.
I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose.
satish
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding.
During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Alan, I prefer repeats for a good person over a new person. It is a reward for dedication. Regards Alberto De: ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: domingo, 18 de marzo de 2018 11:36 p.m. Para: Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann@bachollet.fr> CC: ALAC Working List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Re: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama My personal opinion is that with such a small number of slots (perhaps just 1 this meeting), it is preferable to being in new people who have not seen or not often seen an ICANN meeting. That being said, for San Juan, we did manage to at least partially fund past recipients because we ended up with additional slots to re-allocate. Do others think we should favour repeats for a good person over a new person? Alan At 18/03/2018 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet wrote: Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero@msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> > a écrit : Dear Alan, What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"? Regards, Maritza Enviado desde mi iPhone El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz < eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com <mailto:eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> > escribió: Ok with me. -ed - On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com <mailto:sb.inapp@gmail.com> > wrote: Thanks Alan. I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose. satish On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com <mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com> > wrote: Dear Alan, Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS. Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots? Regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> > escribió: We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C) -- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA C ) --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
+1 Alberto, especially because we only have 2 slots On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote:
Alan, I prefer repeats for a good person over a new person. It is a reward for dedication.
Regards
Alberto
*De:* ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *En nombre de *Alan Greenberg *Enviado el:* domingo, 18 de marzo de 2018 11:36 p.m. *Para:* Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann@bachollet.fr> *CC:* ALAC Working List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> *Asunto:* Re: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama
My personal opinion is that with such a small number of slots (perhaps just 1 this meeting), it is preferable to being in new people who have not seen or not often seen an ICANN meeting. That being said, for San Juan, we did manage to at least partially fund past recipients because we ended up with additional slots to re-allocate.
Do others think we should favour repeats for a good person over a new person?
Alan
At 18/03/2018 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet wrote:
Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB
Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero@msn.com> a écrit :
Dear Alan,
What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"?
Regards,
Maritza
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz < eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> escribió:
Ok with me.
-ed
-
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Alan.
I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose.
satish
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc
Abogado
Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial
Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo
LLM Queen Mary University of London
PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding.
During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaig...> Libre de virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaig...> <#m_-4850677222329652506_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
Or one of both…. == Bart From: Maureen Hilyard Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 7:33 AM To: Alberto Soto Cc: ALAC Working List; Alan Greenberg Subject: Re: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama +1 Alberto, especially because we only have 2 slots On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Alberto Soto <asoto@ibero-americano.org> wrote: Alan, I prefer repeats for a good person over a new person. It is a reward for dedication. Regards Alberto De: ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: domingo, 18 de marzo de 2018 11:36 p.m. Para: Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann@bachollet.fr> CC: ALAC Working List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Re: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama My personal opinion is that with such a small number of slots (perhaps just 1 this meeting), it is preferable to being in new people who have not seen or not often seen an ICANN meeting. That being said, for San Juan, we did manage to at least partially fund past recipients because we ended up with additional slots to re-allocate. Do others think we should favour repeats for a good person over a new person? Alan At 18/03/2018 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet wrote: Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero@msn.com> a écrit : Dear Alan, What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"? Regards, Maritza Enviado desde mi iPhone El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz < eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> escribió: Ok with me. -ed - On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Alan. I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose. satish On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Alan, Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS. Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots? Regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > escribió: We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) -- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA... ) Libre de virus. www.avast.com _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
I would STRONGLY suggest that we NEVER use the word "reward" in conjunction with a travel opportunity! It sets a very bad message. Alan At 19/03/2018 07:23 AM, Alberto Soto wrote:
Alan, I prefer repeats for a good person over a new person. It is a reward for dedication. Regards Alberto
De: ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: domingo, 18 de marzo de 2018 11:36 p.m. Para: Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann@bachollet.fr> CC: ALAC Working List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Re: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama
My personal opinion is that with such a small number of slots (perhaps just 1 this meeting), it is preferable to being in new people who have not seen or not often seen an ICANN meeting. That being said, for San Juan, we did manage to at least partially fund past recipients because we ended up with additional slots to re-allocate.
Do others think we should favour repeats for a good person over a new person?
Alan
At 18/03/2018 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet wrote:
Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB
Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <<mailto:myaguero@msn.com>myaguero@msn.com> a écrit :
Dear Alan,
What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"?
Regards,
Maritza
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz <<mailto:eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> escribió:
Ok with me.
-ed
-
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <<mailto:sb.inapp@gmail.com>sb.inapp@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Alan. I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose.
satish
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Alan, Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS. Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > escribió: We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )
Libre de virus. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>www.avast.com
Alan, I believe the criteria that you mention below is sufficient, as for newcomers or previous participants for continuity, I think both arguments are valid and maybe it could depend on the candidate and the criteria that you mention. Best Hadia Hadia Elminiawi (M.Sc.) Director, DNS-Entrepreneurship Center [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/268513_180152888707645_7698168_n.jpg][logo] National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority Tel: +202 3534 4392 Fax: +202 3537 4000 Email: hadia@tra.gov.eg<https://mail.dnsec.eg/owa/redir.aspx?C=8f4aa197b9f840be8139d76b29a0df99&URL=...> From: ALAC [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 4:36 AM To: Sebicann Bachollet Cc: ALAC Working List Subject: Re: [ALAC] "Policy" t4ravel slots for Panama My personal opinion is that with such a small number of slots (perhaps just 1 this meeting), it is preferable to being in new people who have not seen or not often seen an ICANN meeting. That being said, for San Juan, we did manage to at least partially fund past recipients because we ended up with additional slots to re-allocate. Do others think we should favour repeats for a good person over a new person? Alan At 18/03/2018 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet wrote: Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero@msn.com<mailto:myaguero@msn.com>> a écrit : Dear Alan, What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"? Regards, Maritza Enviado desde mi iPhone El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz < eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com<mailto:eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com>> escribió: Ok with me. -ed - On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com<mailto:sb.inapp@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks Alan. I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose. satish On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Alan, Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS. Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots? Regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> > escribió: We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots". Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as: There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama. Are there other criteria that we should consider. As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured. The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) -- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<http://www.atlarge.icann.org/> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA... )
We also have the community onboarding program for new people we want to groom as leaders. However, I think we also want to do as Alberto had suggested and give it to someone who has gone before Best Judith Sent from my iPhone Judith@jhellerstein.com Skype ID:Judithhellerstein
On Mar 18, 2018, at 10:22 PM, Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann@bachollet.fr> wrote:
Hello all, We may wish to invest in people with some continuity (like for the fellowship program). Thanks SeB
Le 18 mars 2018 à 21:56, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero@msn.com> a écrit :
Dear Alan,
What does it means: "strong history of such involvement in the past"?
Regards,
Maritza
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 18 mar. 2018, a las 21:20, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> escribió:
Ok with me.
-ed
-
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 9:18 PM Satish Babu <sb.inapp@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks Alan.
I've no specific suggestions, but would be happy to discuss any new criteria that you may want to propose.
satish
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 06:26 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding.
During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) -- NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Hi Humberto, We had requested five additional travel slots and were allocated two. Whether there should be additional criteria is what I was asking. I believe what I proposed is sufficient, and so far Alberto, Satish and Eduardo have replied with no additional criteria. Although we have these two slots, one may need to be used for our new SSAC Liaison. I am waiting to hear if the SSAC is funding him as they generally have for Julie. However, in each of the prior two meetings where we have had these slots, other slots have opened up to allow additional travellers. Alan At 18/03/2018 08:56 PM, Humberto Carrasco wrote:
Dear Alan,
Thanks a lot for this email. We have 2 slots and 5 RALOS.
Will There be any other criteria to select these 2 slots?
Regards
Humberto Carrasco Blanc Abogado Profesor Asociado Derecho Económico - Comercial Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh
El 18-03-2018, a las 17:15, Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> escribió:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding.
During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
The policy meeting is usually for policy work, I don't think we should have newbie for that. I however suggest that those who have not attended ICANN meeting before but have been participating remotely should be given priority. Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 1:49 AM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
We have a short time to do the call for travellers for the "policy slots".
Last time, the criteria were summarized in the call for expressions of interest as:
*There are two travel slots that will be allocated to At-Large participants who are ACTIVELY involved in some ICANN policy activity, or those with a strong history of such involvement in the past and an interest to restart. Those include gNSO or ccNSO PDPs, CCWGs, ALAC support Working Groups and the At-Large Review (with a lesser emphasis on the latter). Other slots may be opened due to other travellers not being able to attend or not requiring full funding. *During the selection, we decided that to the extent practical, we should also tried to select people who had not been previously selected. I an recommending doing that again, and also, to the extent possible, try to identify people who will best benefit from the extensive policy discussions we expect in Panama.
Are there other criteria that we should consider.
As in the past, the selection will be done by the RALO chairs and me, to best identify local talent who need to be favoured.
The call needs to be made very soon, so please contact me quickly if you have input.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
participants (12)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Alberto Soto -
bartlett.morgan＠gmail.com -
Eduardo Diaz -
Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi -
Humberto Carrasco -
Judith Hellerstein -
Maritza Y. Aguero Minano -
Maureen Hilyard -
Satish Babu -
Sebicann Bachollet -
Seun Ojedeji