Yes, I do accept the nomination and look forward to continuing in 
this role. Alan

At 01/12/2010 08:25 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>Thank You Alan  I accept that nomination  with great pleasure,  and 
>of course if endorsed / elected in this bylaw mandated role, I will 
>perform to the best of my ability on behalf of At-Large and the 
>ALAC... and YES  we can't have me getting bored now, can we ;-)
>
>While the ALAC is considering their bylaw mandated Liaisons to the 
>Support Organisations,  I would very much like to  ask if you would 
>accept a nomination from me to continue in your role as GNSO 
>Liaison, even though you are no longer a serving member of the ALAC 
>after next weeks ICANN AGM;  Your experience and the respect you 
>hold in the GNSO Council resulting from you undertaking this 
>role  for several years now, is in my less than humble view, far to 
>valuable to our community and the ALAC to loose, especially at this 
>time, so I am formally nominating you to continue on the role of 
>GNSO Liaison, and ask you consider accepting it very seriously 
>indeed;  I do realize that at this time, there is no guaranteeing 
>of  any travel support to attend ICANN Meetings if you are not on 
>the ALAC or a supported  RALO Leader, but this is a matter that the 
>next ALAC ExCom and the Bidget and Finance Sub-Committee, will be 
>raising  in our future budget planning and requests  for 
>consideration in the coming fiscal year, (I personally believe the 
>argument that the bylaw mandated SO Liaisons being supported by 
>constituency travel {even of shared  cost centers are the ALAC and 
>the receiving SO}  is a strong one)  based on aspects of the ALAC 
>Review Recommendations and our current Review Implementation 
>processes, and of course does fit within the current ICANN Strategic 
>Planning primary objectives...
>
>So if you are willing to risk the role  requiring in the short term 
>some remote participation if we fail to get such full funding this 
>coming year  then I would not see that as in any way an impediment.
>
>I look forward to your affirmative reply,
>
>Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>(CLO)
>
>
>
>On 2 December 2010 11:38, Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
>At 26/11/2010 11:22 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> >Election Call for ALAC Liaisons to serve from  Dec 2010 to ICANN AGM 2011.
>I would like nominate Cheryl Langdon-Orr for the position of ALAC
>Liaison to the ccNSO.
>My rationale is as follows:
>1. Cheryl has a strong working relationship with both the outgoing
>and incoming ccNSO Chairs.
>2. Cheryl has a long ccTLD history and so is in a good position to
>develop meaningful relationships with individual ccNSO members,
>helping to forge links between ccTLDs an regional At-Large organizations.
>3. DNS Security (and the infamous DNS CERT discussion) and
>Accountability and Transparency are two issues that are important to
>both the ALAC and the ccNSO and Cheryl is arguably the best person to
>represent us in these areas.
>4. With Cheryl no longer being ALAC Chair and a member of the ATRT,
>as a mere ALAC Vice-Chair, she is going to bored out of her mind, and
>she needs some extra things to focus on.
>Alan
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: <http://st.icann.org/alac>http://st.icann.org/alac