Dec. 2, 2010
2:36 a.m.
Yes, I do accept the nomination and look forward to continuing in
this role. Alan
At 01/12/2010 08:25 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>Thank You Alan I accept that nomination with great pleasure, and
>of course if endorsed / elected in this bylaw mandated role, I will
>perform to the best of my ability on behalf of At-Large and the
>ALAC... and YES we can't have me getting bored now, can we ;-)
>
>While the ALAC is considering their bylaw mandated Liaisons to the
>Support Organisations, I would very much like to ask if you would
>accept a nomination from me to continue in your role as GNSO
>Liaison, even though you are no longer a serving member of the ALAC
>after next weeks ICANN AGM; Your experience and the respect you
>hold in the GNSO Council resulting from you undertaking this
>role for several years now, is in my less than humble view, far to
>valuable to our community and the ALAC to loose, especially at this
>time, so I am formally nominating you to continue on the role of
>GNSO Liaison, and ask you consider accepting it very seriously
>indeed; I do realize that at this time, there is no guaranteeing
>of any travel support to attend ICANN Meetings if you are not on
>the ALAC or a supported RALO Leader, but this is a matter that the
>next ALAC ExCom and the Bidget and Finance Sub-Committee, will be
>raising in our future budget planning and requests for
>consideration in the coming fiscal year, (I personally believe the
>argument that the bylaw mandated SO Liaisons being supported by
>constituency travel {even of shared cost centers are the ALAC and
>the receiving SO} is a strong one) based on aspects of the ALAC
>Review Recommendations and our current Review Implementation
>processes, and of course does fit within the current ICANN Strategic
>Planning primary objectives...
>
>So if you are willing to risk the role requiring in the short term
>some remote participation if we fail to get such full funding this
>coming year then I would not see that as in any way an impediment.
>
>I look forward to your affirmative reply,
>
>Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>(CLO)
>
>
>
>On 2 December 2010 11:38, Alan Greenberg
><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
>At 26/11/2010 11:22 PM, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> >Election Call for ALAC Liaisons to serve from Dec 2010 to ICANN AGM 2011.
>I would like nominate Cheryl Langdon-Orr for the position of ALAC
>Liaison to the ccNSO.
>My rationale is as follows:
>1. Cheryl has a strong working relationship with both the outgoing
>and incoming ccNSO Chairs.
>2. Cheryl has a long ccTLD history and so is in a good position to
>develop meaningful relationships with individual ccNSO members,
>helping to forge links between ccTLDs an regional At-Large organizations.
>3. DNS Security (and the infamous DNS CERT discussion) and
>Accountability and Transparency are two issues that are important to
>both the ALAC and the ccNSO and Cheryl is arguably the best person to
>represent us in these areas.
>4. With Cheryl no longer being ALAC Chair and a member of the ATRT,
>as a mere ALAC Vice-Chair, she is going to bored out of her mind, and
>she needs some extra things to focus on.
>Alan
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: <http://st.icann.org/alac>http://st.icann.org/alac