FW: [At-Large] ALAC response to the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook
Dear All, Please see below a note from Evan Leibovitch regarding the latest version of the draft ALAC statement on the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook (available at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draft+Fi...). Please review and make your comments by Tuesday, 30 November either by e-mail or by using the comment function on the wiki page. Kind regards, Heidi -----Original Message----- From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 10:58 PM To: ICANN GTLD WG list; ICANN At-Large list Subject: [At-Large] ALAC response to the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook Hello all. I've just finished incorporating the input received in today's drafting call into the ALAC statement on the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook. https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draft+Fi... Please review and comment. - Evan _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Dear Evan and all, thanks for this excellent draft of the ALAC response (...) what I fully support, and I guess I can speak on behalf of EURALO (taking into consideration our last support message to you). I have one question only - In the 3rd last para, first line, it reads: "It is unfortunate that the DAG has regressed ..." Is it DAG or PAG? Kind regards, Wolf Heidi Ullrich wrote Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:40:
Dear All,
Please see below a note from Evan Leibovitch regarding the latest version of the draft ALAC statement on the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook (available at: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draft+Fi...).
Please review and make your comments by Tuesday, 30 November either by e-mail or by using the comment function on the wiki page.
Kind regards, Heidi
-----Original Message----- From: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 10:58 PM To: ICANN GTLD WG list; ICANN At-Large list Subject: [At-Large] ALAC response to the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook
Hello all.
I've just finished incorporating the input received in today's drafting call into the ALAC statement on the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook.
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draft+Fi...
Please review and comment.
- Evan _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
comunica-ch phone +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig www.comunica-ch.net Digitale Allmend http://blog.allmend.ch - EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org
On 25 November 2010 09:23, Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net> wrote:
Dear Evan and all,
thanks for this excellent draft of the ALAC response (...) what I fully support, and I guess I can speak on behalf of EURALO (taking into consideration our last support message to you).
I have one question only - In the 3rd last para, first line, it reads: "It is unfortunate that the DAG has regressed ..." Is it DAG or PAG?
It is indeed supposed to be "PAG" (which I chose in preference to "Final Applicant Guidebook -- FAG") Fixed. Thanks! - Evan
participants (3)
-
Evan Leibovitch -
Heidi Ullrich -
Wolf Ludwig