Re: [ALAC] FW: [At-Large] ALAC response to the Proposed Final Applicant Guidebook

On 25 November 2010 09:23, Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net> wrote:

Dear Evan and all,

thanks for this excellent draft of the ALAC response (...) what I fully support, and I guess I can speak on behalf of EURALO (taking into consideration our last support message to you).

I have one question only - In the 3rd last para, first line, it reads: "It is unfortunate that the DAG has regressed ..." Is it DAG or PAG?

It is indeed supposed to be "PAG" (which I chose in preference to "Final Applicant Guidebook -- FAG") Fixed. Thanks! - Evan