Revised RPM Requirements include At-large Proposals to handle IDN variants issues
Dear All, ICANN just published the Revised RPM Requirements. http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm It is impressive that ICANN finally responded to the at-large community's persistent requests on handling IDN variants involved in the RPMs, both for implementation of the Sunrise and Trademark Claims processes in new gTLDs, Many things were clarified and communicated efficiently through the direct dialogue between ICANN Board, SSAC and effected IDN user community, before and at Durban, under the leadership of ALAC. Although there is still room for improvement regarding these revisions, I believe the positive move deserves our support to make sure they could be finally adopted after the public comments. Please advise whether ALAC would wish to submit a comment, before August 27. Best, Hong -- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
Dear Hong, I am certain that the ALAC would be happy to express support for the clear progress and inclusion of stakeholder concerns. Would you like to propose a draft comment for the ALAC's consideration? The ALAC appreciates your vigilance, contribution and leadership on this matter. I do not think that we could have gotten this far without your active contributions. Best regards, Rinalia On Aug 7, 2013 8:27 PM, "Hong Xue" <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
ICANN just published the Revised RPM Requirements. http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm
It is impressive that ICANN finally responded to the at-large community's persistent requests on handling IDN variants involved in the RPMs, both for implementation of the Sunrise and Trademark Claims processes in new gTLDs,
Many things were clarified and communicated efficiently through the direct dialogue between ICANN Board, SSAC and effected IDN user community, before and at Durban, under the leadership of ALAC.
Although there is still room for improvement regarding these revisions, I believe the positive move deserves our support to make sure they could be finally adopted after the public comments.
Please advise whether ALAC would wish to submit a comment, before August 27.
Best,
Hong
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
*Dear Hong,* *like others before me, I support your remarks and suggestion.* *Best regards,* *Jean-Jacques.* 2013/8/7 Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>
Dear Hong,
I am certain that the ALAC would be happy to express support for the clear progress and inclusion of stakeholder concerns. Would you like to propose a draft comment for the ALAC's consideration?
The ALAC appreciates your vigilance, contribution and leadership on this matter. I do not think that we could have gotten this far without your active contributions.
Best regards,
Rinalia On Aug 7, 2013 8:27 PM, "Hong Xue" <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
ICANN just published the Revised RPM Requirements.
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm
It is impressive that ICANN finally responded to the at-large community's persistent requests on handling IDN variants involved in the RPMs, both for implementation of the Sunrise and Trademark Claims processes in new gTLDs,
Many things were clarified and communicated efficiently through the
direct
dialogue between ICANN Board, SSAC and effected IDN user community, before and at Durban, under the leadership of ALAC.
Although there is still room for improvement regarding these revisions, I believe the positive move deserves our support to make sure they could be finally adopted after the public comments.
Please advise whether ALAC would wish to submit a comment, before August 27.
Best,
Hong
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Hi Hong: Seeing your signaling progress here is very gratifying, given the concerns expressed so often before now. I would recommend that you contribute a draft of a likely ALAC statement for advice and consent. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
ICANN just published the Revised RPM Requirements. http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm
It is impressive that ICANN finally responded to the at-large community's persistent requests on handling IDN variants involved in the RPMs, both for implementation of the Sunrise and Trademark Claims processes in new gTLDs,
Many things were clarified and communicated efficiently through the direct dialogue between ICANN Board, SSAC and effected IDN user community, before and at Durban, under the leadership of ALAC.
Although there is still room for improvement regarding these revisions, I believe the positive move deserves our support to make sure they could be finally adopted after the public comments.
Please advise whether ALAC would wish to submit a comment, before August 27.
Best,
Hong
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Okay, I can surely draft a short piece to state that we support the responsive solution to prevent the user confusion in the IDN community through improving the RPM requirements applicable to all new gTLG registries in the processes of Sunrise registration and Trademark Claims. I will send the draft to the WG and ALAC for review. Hong On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi Hong: Seeing your signaling progress here is very gratifying, given the concerns expressed so often before now. I would recommend that you contribute a draft of a likely ALAC statement for advice and consent.
-Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
ICANN just published the Revised RPM Requirements.
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm
It is impressive that ICANN finally responded to the at-large community's persistent requests on handling IDN variants involved in the RPMs, both for implementation of the Sunrise and Trademark Claims processes in new gTLDs,
Many things were clarified and communicated efficiently through the direct dialogue between ICANN Board, SSAC and effected IDN user community, before and at Durban, under the leadership of ALAC.
Although there is still room for improvement regarding these revisions, I believe the positive move deserves our support to make sure they could be finally adopted after the public comments.
Please advise whether ALAC would wish to submit a comment, before August 27.
Best,
Hong
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China
participants (4)
-
Carlton Samuels -
Hong Xue -
JJS -
Rinalia Abdul Rahim