Hi Hong: Seeing your signaling progress here is very gratifying, given the concerns expressed so often before now. I would recommend that you contribute a draft of a likely ALAC statement for advice and consent. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Hong Xue <hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
ICANN just published the Revised RPM Requirements. http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/rpm-requirements-06aug13-en.htm
It is impressive that ICANN finally responded to the at-large community's persistent requests on handling IDN variants involved in the RPMs, both for implementation of the Sunrise and Trademark Claims processes in new gTLDs,
Many things were clarified and communicated efficiently through the direct dialogue between ICANN Board, SSAC and effected IDN user community, before and at Durban, under the leadership of ALAC.
Although there is still room for improvement regarding these revisions, I believe the positive move deserves our support to make sure they could be finally adopted after the public comments.
Please advise whether ALAC would wish to submit a comment, before August 27.
Best,
Hong
-- Professor Dr. Hong Xue Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL) Beijing Normal University http://www.iipl.org.cn/ 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)