Good evening: 1. Having written the AlAC comment on the erstwhile WHOIS waiver regime, I would be glad to participate in preparing the ALAC position on this matter. 2. I have not volunteered for this new temporary group. Thirty hours a week of non-remunerated voluntary work is disproportionate and excessive. 3. In the light of the history, of which I have direct and long standing personal experience, I consider that GNSO as presently constituted has disqualified itself for any role in WHOIS Privacy policy. No. Best regards to you all CW PS: I have missed completely the current loop about 'fellowship discussions'. Presumably on a different List - ?
El 13 de julio de 2018 a las 19:06 Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> escribió:
I agree, the value of the discussions is in everyone having their say and being credited with it.
There have been 67 comments that have been made on the Fellowship discussion.. and only 17 are mine in response or statement drafts, so Im not monopolising 😊
M
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan Zuck <JZuck@innovatorsnetwork.org> wrote:
Here's this for laughs: http:// <http://cpwg.wiki/Epdp>cpwg.wiki <http://cpwg.wiki/Epdp>/ <http://cpwg.wiki/Epdp>Epdp <http://cpwg.wiki/Epdp>
Meanwhile, I'll ask staff to copy comments but they won't be attributed to you easily. Best if each person does it. Jonathan
Jonathan Zuck Executive Director Innovators Network Foundation www.InnovatorsNetwork.org <http://%3Cbr/%3Ewww.InnovatorsNetwork.org>
------------------------------ *From:* NA-Discuss <na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of h.raiche@internode.on.net <h.raiche@internode.on.net> *Sent:* Friday, July 13, 2018 6:56:20 AM *To:* Alan Greenberg; ALAC-Announce; AFRALO; APRALO; EURALO; LACRALO-EN; NA-Discuss *Subject:* Re: [NA-Discuss] [ALAC-Announce] Call for comments
This is exactly what I complained about. Tijani, Bastiaan, Hadia and my comments are NOT there.
So Evin, please work with Jonathan to track down any and all comments made on this issue - and then the two of you make sure the link to this page is on the policy page front and centre. Otherwise, we risk not capturing what ALAC members think.
(and Alan's explanation would also be useful as an introduction to the issue - together with any additional such as the fact that we are in the process of selecting ALAC members for the EPDP - and when they are named, list them on the page
Thanks
Holly
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>
To: "ALAC-Announce" <alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "AFRALO" < afri-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "APRALO" < apac-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "EURALO" < euro-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "LACRALO-EN" < lac-discuss-en@icann.org>, "NA-Discuss" <na-discuss@atlarge-lists. icann.org> Cc:
Sent: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 19:35:31 -0400 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] Call for comments
As I hope you are all aware, due to the European General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR), access to some gTLD Domain Name registrant information (WHOIS) is being restricted. Traditionally, for a registrant who did not use a proxy service a WHOIS Query would reveal their full name, address, phone number and e-mail address. If you do a lookup for one of my addresses today you will see almost nothing! Try looking up alangreenberg.org at https://whois.icann.org.
This increases privacy for some registrants and also makes information harder to access for those who currently use WHOIS.
There are serious monetary fines associated with GDPR, so compliance is important.
In addressing the new regulations, there has been a lot of discussion within ICANN over the last year. A GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) started about 2 years ago which should have provided a new system (now called a Registration Directory Service (RDS) instead of WHOIS), but unfortunately that process has not completed in sufficient time.
As a result, to meet the GDPR deadline of 25 May 2018, the ICANN Board implemented a Temporary Specification Policy to allow us and our contracted parties (Registrars and Registries) to be GDPR-compliant. That temporary policy must be replaced by a permanent one within one year - a VERY short time for ICANN policy development.
The GNSO is starting an Expedited PDP which can complete faster than a regular PDP. The ALAC is being given two Members in the this group. We need to establish what our guiding principles are.
Please visit https://community.icann.org/x/_YlHBQ, read what others think, and contribute your thoughts on what positions we should be taking
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ APAC-Discuss mailing list APAC-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce
At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org