Hi Alan That is something that we haven't yet discussed or agreed - whether the vote is open, or not. In the past it's been by secret ballot. Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 10:59 AM To: Robert Guerra Cc: At-large Worldwide Subject: Re: [At-Large] Board liaison - What's the process to be selected ..? I agree on all points. I still have a preference for no third-party campaigning, but perhaps that is just me. Given the high-contested election, I do have a preference for a secret ballot to minimize bad feelings, and to ensure that people vote for who they believe is the best candidate instead of who they may feel they have to visibly support. Alan At 18/06/2007 10:34 AM, Robert Guerra wrote:
Alan:
Thanks for the comments on the process and request of information from the candidates.
My concern is that the process, in as much as possible - be as open and transparent as possible. Comments should, i think not only come from the candidates - but from all those involved in at-large.
Key positions, should - wherever possible be subject to comment, consultation, and an open and transparent process. Not sure if nominations/decisions have been done that way in the past. If they haven't, then we should change them. we have the occasion now , so let's try..
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/852 - Release Date: 6/17/2007 8:23 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.0/852 - Release Date: 6/17/2007 8:23 AM