I am jumping a little late, maybe. I wan't to agree with Evan's opinions in both past emails. Also, we have our own process in At Large, there was a Bottom Up discussion in order to come up with that. Maybe it is not the greatest process but I believe that could be useful to determine who could be the "best advocate" for At Large at the Board. Regards, Andrés Piazza
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:49:14 +0100 From: khaled.koubaa@topnet.tn To: at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN Board Nomination
I agree. Indeed, I am hoping that some very worthy people step forward to be considered. (Usually the NomnComm receives many many applications for Board positions. I wonder how many of them might be suitable as an At-Large designee?)
I wonder what good process we need to inform people about that opportunity, and what good process we need to select them. May be we should create our own NomCom ?
_______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org