McTim <dogwallah@gmail.com> [2016-04-26 17:45:02 -0400]:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh@cis-india.org> wrote:
Dear Vanda,
Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org> [2016-04-26 19:25:18 +0000]:
Yes Leon i agree with your thesis more registry/ registrar makes their association strong not the government of the country where they are located
Could you please point me to the Registry or Registrar association in the US that opposed domain name seizures? I would be much obliged.
i2c does quite a bit of that sort of that. Many registrars and hosting providers in that one.
I don't see anything on domain name seizures on their website despite their self-described genesis post-SOPA: https://www.google.co.in/search?num=30&q=domain+name+seizures+site%3Ai2coali... Nor outside of their website: https://www.google.co.in/search?num=30&q="i2coalition"+"domain+name+seizures" https://www.google.co.in/search?num=30&q="i2coalition"+"domain+seizures"
theDNA.org should probably take up that sort of thing, but they are fairly nascent.
https://www.google.co.in/search?num=30&q=seizures+site%3Athedna.org -- Pranesh Prakash Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society http://cis-india.org | tel:+91 80 40926283 sip:pranesh@ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh@cis-india.org https://twitter.com/pranesh