None of the citations apply to IP address distribution, which is what I thought we were talking about in this thread.
Basically the context in which I was providing those examples are one where to forecast how the Courts are going to rule on a decision, one has to examine how the laws will be treated. The Council of Europe views IP addresses as shared public resources to be allocated and managed in the public interest. I then pointed to the manner in which the ECJ approached the prioritisation of rights and interests etc. The two cases that were provided show the tests (Article 8) and are useful reading. Happy to skype and discuss at a mutually convenient time and happy to hear your perspective.
The EU does have some legislation about IP addresses not being personally identifiable data IIRC.
-- Cheers,
McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala Tweeter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Cell: +679 998 2851