On 12-May-08, at 11:54 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Robert Guerra wrote:
That being said, I do have an issue with the congressional statement as it seemed to indicate that ICANN was supportive of freedom of expression. I would disagree, as board and GNSO decisions seem to more limit speech then anything else. Triple X being one example , wanting to censor IDN domain names another..
In other words, ICANN _does_ support freedom of expression ... to the same extent as the US government does. ;-)
I would disagree . There are no references to Freedom of expression in the ICANN bylaws. I am raising the issue, as I'd like to know where At-Large stands on stronger protections related to freedom of expression. Personally, it's an issue I would like the At-Large summit to address.. regards Robert